Antioxidant supplementation during illness in dogs: effect on oxidative stress and outcome, an exploratory study

• DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13050
• Publication Date: 2019-07-11T05:58:39Z
• Authors: D. M. Hagen; J. L. Ekena; B. M. Geesaman; K. R. Viviano
• Keywords: 2. Zero hunger; 0403 veterinary science; Oxidative Stress; Dogs; Dietary Supplements; Animals; Vitamin E; Dog Diseases; 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences; Glutathione; Antioxidants

ObjectivesTo assess whether combination antioxidant supplementation for 30 days in systemically ill dogs alters antioxidant status, degree of lipid peroxidation, clinical score and survival.Materials and MethodsForty client‐owned systemically‐ill hospitalised dogs were eligible for inclusion. Dogs were randomised to no supplementation (NS; n=19) or supplementation with N‐acetylcysteine/S‐adenosylmethionine/silybin and vitamin E (AS; n=20) for 30 days. Clinical score and oxidative biomarkers including glutathione, cysteine, vitamin E, selenium and urine isoprostanes/creatinine (F2‐IsoPs/Cr) were determined on days 0 and 30. Glutathione, cysteine, vitamin E and urine F2‐IsoPs/Cr were quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography, and selenium concentrations determined using atomic absorption spectroscopy.ResultsThirty‐two dogs completed the study (NS, n=16; AS, n=16). Vitamin E concentrations were significantly greater in the supplemented compared to the non‐supplemented group. No other markers of oxidative stress significantly changed with supplementation. There was no difference in Day 30 clinical scores or survival between the two groups.Clinical SignificanceIn this population of systemically‐ill hospitalised dogs, combination antioxidant supplementation did not alter redox state or clinical outcome.