A study of Culicoides in Rondônia, in the Brazilian Amazon: species composition, relative abundance and potential vectors

Male Culicoides Propriipennis Epidemiology Culicoides Paraensis Vigilance Culicoides Contubernalis Forests Culicoides Quasiparaensis Ceratopogonidae Culicoides Paraignacioi Culicoides Vernoni Culicoides Lutzi 0302 clinical medicine Culicoides Santanderi Disease Carrier Disease Vector New Record Arbovirus Culicoides Culicoides Kampa Culicoides Pseudodiabolicus Biodiversity Grassland Relative Abundance Culicoides Glabellus Insect Vector Female Culicoides Fluvialis Brazil Culicoides Plaumanni Rural Area Culicoides Paucienfuscatus Culicoides Rhombus Amazonas Culicoides Limai Culicoides Kuripako Culicoides Gabaldoni Culicoides Pusillus 03 medical and health sciences Culicoides Guerrai Community Composition Culicoides Diabolicus Culicoides Tetrathyris Animals Forest Culicoides Efferus Culicoides Fieldi Culicoides Leopoldoi Culicoides Ocumarensis Population Density Culicoides Pachymerus Culicoides Hylas Culicoides Foxi Species Diversity 15. Life on land Culicoides Coutinhoi Insect Vectors Trap (equipment) Culicoides Glabrior Culicoides Insignis Species Richness Insect Animal Distribution Culicoides Tidwelli
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12208 Publication Date: 2016-11-23T11:22:22Z
ABSTRACT
Abstract There is very little information available about C ulicoides species ( D iptera: eratopogonidae) in the western B razilian A mazon. However, studies of fauna this region are essential to knowledge and potential vectors within it. Thus, present study aims evaluate abundance, richness composition rural areas state R ondônia, razil. specimens were collected forest pasture environments municipality P orto V elho, using light traps. total 1708 individuals (1136 females 572 males) belonging 33 collected; 28 these samples represent new records for ondônia include first record contubernalis insignis was most abundant (86.1%). Species greater (32 species, 96.96%), whereas pastures presented greatest number captured n = 1540, 90.1%). This shows that populations differ between indicates abundance . an important factor epidemiological vigilance region.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (33)
CITATIONS (13)