Distinct neural dynamics underlying risk and ambiguity during valued‐based decision making

• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14201
• Publication Date: 2022-11-13T14:36:00Z
• Authors: Leyou Deng; Qi Li; Mang Zhang; Puyu Shi; Ya Zheng
• Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Decision Making; Uncertainty; Humans; Evoked Potentials; Probability

AbstractUncertainty can be fractioned into risk and ambiguity psychologically and neurobiologically. However, whether and how risk and ambiguity are dissociated in terms of neural dynamics during value‐based decision making remain elusive. The present event‐related potential (ERP) study addressed these issues by asking participants to perform a wheel‐of‐fortune task either during a risky context (Experiment 1; N = 30) where outcome probability was known or during an ambiguous context (Experiment 2; N = 30) where outcome probability was unknown. Results revealed that the cue‐P3 was more enhanced for risk versus ambiguity during the anticipatory phase, whereas the RewP was more increased for ambiguity than risk during the consummatory phase. Moreover, the SPN and the fb‐P3 components were further modulated by the levels of risk and ambiguity, respectively. These findings demonstrate a neural dissociation between risk and ambiguity, which unfolds from the anticipatory phase to the consummatory phase.