An evaluation of the usability and durability of 3D printed versus standard suture materials

• DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13175
• Publication Date: 2024-03-27T12:52:51Z
• Authors: Thang T. Nguyen; Jason G. Langenfeld; Benjamin C. Reinhart; Elizabeth I. Lyden; Abraham S. Campos; Michael C. Wadman; Matthew R. Jamison; Stephen A. Morin; Aaron N. Barksdale
• Keywords: 3d printed

Abstract The capability to produce suture material using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology may have applications in remote health facilities where rapid restocking of supplies is not an option. This a feasibility study evaluating the usability 3D‐printed sutures repair laceration wound when compared with standard material. was manufactured fused deposition modelling 3D printer and nylon filament. Study participants were tasked performing repairs on pigs' feet, first 3‐0 WeGo material, followed by Twenty‐six enrolled study. Survey data demonstrated statistical significance how well performed knot tying, 8.9 versus 7.5 ( p = 0.0018). Statistical observed suture's ultimate tensile strength Novafil (274.8 vs. 199.8 MPa, 0.0096). also extension commercial (49% 37%, 0.0215). successful manufacture provided insight into its