Rapid‐rate paired associative stimulation of the median nerve and motor cortex can produce long‐lasting changes in motor cortical excitability in humans

• DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114025
• Publication Date: 2006-07-07T00:25:07Z
• Authors: Angelo Quartarone; Vincenzo Rizzo; Sergio Bagnato; Francesca Morgante; Antonino Sant'Angelo; Paolo Girlanda; Hartwig Roman Sie...
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Motor Cortex; Pyramidal Tracts; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Electric Stimulation; Median Nerve; Electrophysiology; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; LOW-FREQUENCY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; AFFERENT INHIBITION; REPETITIVE TMS; SILENT PERIOD; WRITERS CRAMP; HUMAN HAND; PLASTICITY; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Female; Neurons, Afferent; Peripheral Nerves

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or repetitive electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (rENS) can induce changes in the excitability of the human motor cortex (M1) that is often short‐lasting and variable, and occurs only after prolonged periods of stimulation. In 10 healthy volunteers, we used a new repetitive paired associative stimulation (rPAS) protocol to facilitate and prolong the effects of rENS and rTMS on cortical excitability. Sub‐motor threshold 5 Hz rENS of the right median nerve was synchronized with submotor threshold 5 Hz rTMS of the left M1 at a constant interval for 2 min. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between the peripheral stimulus and the transcranial stimulation was set at 10 ms (5 Hz rPAS10ms) or 25 ms (5 Hz rPAS25ms). TMS was given over the hot spot of the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. Before and after rPAS, we measured the amplitude of the unconditioned motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF), short‐ and long‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI and LAI) in the conditioned M1. The 5 Hz rPAS25ms protocol but not the 5 Hz rPAS10ms protocol caused a somatotopically specific increase in mean MEP amplitudes in the relaxed APB muscle. The 5 Hz rPAS25ms protocol also led to a loss of SAI, but there was no correlation between individual changes in SAI and corticospinal excitability. These after‐effects were still present 6 h after 5 Hz rPAS25ms. There was no consistent effect on ICI, ICF and LAI. The 5 Hz rENS and 5 Hz rTMS protocols failed to induce any change in corticospinal excitability when given alone. These findings show that 2 min of 5 Hz rPAS25ms produce a long‐lasting and somatotopically specific increase in corticospinal excitability, presumably by sensorimotor disinhibition.