Biological Effects of Low-Dose Chest CT on Chromosomal DNA

• DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020190389
• Publication Date: 2020-03-10T13:55:15Z
• Authors: Hiroaki Sakane; Mari Ishida; Lin Shi; Wataru Fukumoto; Chiemi Sakai; Yoshihiro Miyata; Takafumi Ishida; Tomoyuki Akita; Morihito Okada; Kazuo Awai; Satoshi Tashiro
• Keywords: Aged, 80 and over; Male; Radiation Dosage; Chromosomes; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; Female; Radiography, Thoracic; Prospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Aged

Background Although the National Lung Screening Trial reported a significant reduction in lung cancer mortality when low-dose (LD) CT chest examinations are used for a diagnosis, their biologic effects from radiation exposure remain unclear. Purpose To compare LD CT and standard-dose (SD) CT for DNA double-strand breaks and chromosome aberrations (CAs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Materials and Methods Between March 2016 and June 2018, 209 participants who were referred to a respiratory surgery department for chest CT studies were prospectively enrolled in this study. Individuals were excluded if they had undergone radiography examinations within the last 3 days or had undergone chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Peripheral blood samples were obtained before and 15 minutes after CT. The number of γ-H2AX foci and unstable CAs in lymphocytes was quantified by immunofluorescent staining of γ-H2AX and by fluorescence in situ hybridization by using peptide nucleic acid probes for centromeres and telomeres, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Results Of the 209 participants (105 women, 104 men; mean age, 67.0 years ± 11.3 [standard deviation]), 107 underwent chest LD CT and 102 underwent chest SD CT. Sex distribution, age, and body size metrics were similar between the two groups. The median effective dose of LD CT and SD CT was 1.5 and 5.0 mSv, respectively. The number of double-strand breaks and CAs increased after a SD CT examination (γ-H2AX, P < .001; CAs, P = .003); the number of double-strand breaks and CAs before and after LD CT was not different (γ-H2AX, P = .45; CAs, P = .69). Conclusion No effect of low-dose CT on human DNA was detected. In the same setting, DNA double-strand breaks and chromosome aberrations increased after standard-dose CT. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Brenner in this issue.