Stereotactic Biopsy for Brainstem Tumors: Comparison of Transcerebellar with Transfrontal Approach

• DOI: 10.1159/000335502
• Publication Date: 2012-01-27T09:24:49Z
• Authors: Marcos Dellaretti; Nicolas Reyns; Gustavo Touzet; François Dubois; Sebastião Gusmão; Júlio Leonardo Ba...; Serge Blond
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Stereotaxic Techniques; Cerebellar Cortex; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Biopsy; Brain Stem Neoplasms; Humans; Female; Brain Stem

<i>Background:</i> An important aspect of evaluating patients submitted to stereotactic biopsy of the brainstem is the trajectory used. The literature describes two principal approaches: the suboccipital transcerebellar and the transfrontal; however, no studies exist comparing these two techniques. <i>Objective:</i> The purpose of this study was to compare diagnosis success rates and complications between the suboccipital transcerebellar and transfrontal trajectories. <i>Methods:</i> The study evaluated 142 patients submitted to stereotactic biopsy. The patients presented brainstem tumors in the following areas: pons (n = 31), midbrain (n = 36), medulla (n = 2), pons-medulla (n = 30), pons-midbrain (n = 33), and midbrain-pons-medulla (n = 10). On 123 patients, the transfrontal approach was used, and on 19 the suboccipital transcerebellar approach. <i>Results:</i> Comparing success rates between the two approaches, it was observed that in the group of patients submitted to the transfrontal approach, 95.1% (117 cases) were successful, while in those submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach, 84.2% (16 cases) were successful. Despite a higher success rate among patients in the first group, the difference was not statistically significant. Regarding complications, in patients who were biopsied via the transfrontal trajectory, the morbidity rate was 9.8% (12 cases), while in patients submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach, the morbidity rate was 5.3% (1 case) and the mortality rate 5.3% (1 case). <i>Conclusions:</i> This study verified a higher diagnosis rate in patients submitted to the transfrontal approach than in those submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach (95.1 vs. 84.2%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Regarding complications, the rate was similar in both groups of patients.