Is 8-mm More Effective Than 4-mm Tip Electrode Catheter for Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter?

• DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.7.768
• Publication Date: 2012-06-12T00:42:29Z
• Authors: Chin-Feng Tsai; Ching-Tai Tai; Wen-Chung Yu; Yi-Jen Chen; Ming-Hsiung Hsieh; Chern-En Chiang; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
• Keywords: Male; Equipment Design; Middle Aged; 03 medical and health sciences; Treatment Outcome; 0302 clinical medicine; Atrial Flutter; Recurrence; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Female; Electrodes; Aged; Follow-Up Studies

Background —The prospective, randomized study comparing 4- with 8-mm tip electrodes for radiofrequency linear ablation of typical atrial flutter is not available.

Methods and Results —A total of 104 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter were randomly assigned to undergo radiofrequency linear ablation using a 4- (Group I, n=54) or 8-mm tip electrode (Group II, n=50) catheter (temperature-control model, preset 70°C). If complete bidirectional isthmus block could not be achieved after 5 pulses, the ablation catheter was changed to the other type; the maximal radiofrequency pulse number was limited to <10 pulses. Complete or incomplete isthmus conduction block was assessed by activation sequence in a multielectrode Halo catheter during low lateral right atrial and proximal coronary sinus pacing. Before shifting to the other catheter type, the 8-mm electrode catheter achieved higher complete isthmus block rate (92% versus 67%, P <0.05) with fewer pulses (2±1 versus 3±1, P <0.05), shorter procedure time (24±15 versus 31±12 minutes, P <0.05), and shorter fluoroscopic time (14±10 versus 23±15 minutes, P <0.05). After 5 failed ablation pulses, 12 (67%) of 18 patients in group I attained complete isthmus block by using an 8-mm tip catheter, but none of 4 patients in group II achieved complete block by changing to a 4-mm tip catheter.

Conclusions —The 8-mm tip electrodes are more effective than the standard 4-mm length electrodes in linear ablation for typical atrial flutter. This clinical benefit may be of particular value for some patients with broad and/or thick isthmus.