ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert Consensus Document on Hypertension in the Elderly

• DOI: 10.1161/cir.0b013e31821daaf6
• Publication Date: 2011-04-26T03:29:40Z
• Authors: Wilbert S. Aronow; Jerome L. Fleg; Carl J. Pepine; Nancy T. Artinian; George Bakris; Alan S. Brown; Keith C. Ferdinand; Mary Ann Forciea; William H. Frishman; Cheryl Jaigobin; John B. Kostis; Giuseppi Mancia; Suzanne Oparil; Eduardo Ortiz; Efrain Reisin; Michael W. Rich; Douglas D. Schocken; Michael A. Weber; Deborah J. Wesley
• Keywords: Aged, 80 and over; Research Report; Consensus; Aged, 80 and over; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Cardiology; Advisory Committees; American Heart Association; Foundations; Aged; United States; Research Report; Hypertension; Humans; Consensus; Advisory Committees; Cardiology; American Heart Association; United States; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Hypertension; Humans; Aged; Foundations; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

This document has been developed as an expert consensus document by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA), in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), the American College of Physicians (ACP), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), the American Society of Hypertension (ASH), the American Society of Nephrology (ASN), the American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC), the Association of Black Cardiologists (ABC), and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Expert consensus documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of ACCF and document cosponsors concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community. Topics chosen for coverage by expert consensus documents are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal ACCF/AHA practice guidelines process. Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation. Thus, the reader should view the expert consensus document as the best attempt of the ACCF and document cosponsors to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or evidence to date is not widely applied to clinical practice. When feasible, expert consensus documents include indications or contraindications. Typically, formal recommendations are not provided in expert consensus documents as these documents do not formally grade the quality of evidence, and the provision of “Recommendations” is felt to be more appropriately within the purview of the ACCF/AHA practice guidelines. However, recommendations from ACCF/AHA practice guidelines and ACCF appropriate use criteria are presented where pertinent to the discussion. The writing committee is in agreement with these recommendations. Finally, some topics covered by expert consensus documents will be addressed subsequently by the ACCF/AHA …