Patient-Centered Adherence Intervention After Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospitalization
Patient Care Team
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Reminder Systems
Cardiovascular Agents
Community Pharmacy Services
Health Care Costs
Patient Readmission
Patient Discharge
Medication Adherence
3. Good health
Hospitalization
03 medical and health sciences
Medication Reconciliation
0302 clinical medicine
Patient Education as Topic
Research Design
Patient-Centered Care
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Prospective Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cooperative Behavior
DOI:
10.1161/circoutcomes.111.962290
Publication Date:
2012-07-18T22:16:39Z
AUTHORS (19)
ABSTRACT
Background—
Adherence to cardioprotective medications in the year after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization is generally poor and is associated with increased risk of rehospitalization and mortality. Few interventions have specifically targeted this high-risk patient population to improve medication adherence. We hypothesize that a multifaceted patient-centered intervention could improve adherence to cardioprotective medications.
Methods and Results—
To evaluate this intervention, we propose enrolling 280 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome event into a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. The intervention comprises4 main components: (1) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and tailoring; (2) patient education; (3) collaborative care between pharmacist and primary care provider/cardiologist; and (4) 2 types of voice messaging (educational and medication refill reminder calls). Patients in the intervention arm will visit with the study pharmacist ≈1 week post-hospital discharge. The pharmacist will work with the patient and collaborate with providers to reconcile medication issues. Voice messages will augment the educational process and remind patients to refill their cardioprotective medications. The study will compare the intervention versus usual care for 12 months. The primary outcome of interest is adherence using the ReComp method. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include achievement of targets for blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein, and reduction in the combined cardiovascular end points of myocardial infarction hospitalization, coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Finally, we will also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with usual care.
Conclusions—
If the intervention is effective in improving medication adherence and demonstrating a lower cost, the intervention has the potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk patient population.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (33)
CITATIONS (20)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....