Periprocedural Intravenous Heparin During Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke

Stroke Fibrinolytic agent
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.025329 Publication Date: 2019-07-09T09:00:23Z
AUTHORS (124)
ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose- Intravenous administration of heparin during endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke may improve outcomes. However, risks benefits this adjunctive therapy remain uncertain. We aimed to evaluate periprocedural intravenous use in Dutch intervention centers assess its efficacy safety. Methods- Patients registered between March 2014 June 2016 the MR CLEAN Registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Endovascular Treatment Acute Ischemic Stroke), including all patients treated with Netherlands, were analyzed. The primary outcome was functional (modified Rankin Scale) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes successful recanalization (extended Thrombolysis Cerebral Infarction ≥2B), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality used multilevel regression analysis association on outcomes, adjusted center effects prognostic factors. To account possible unobserved confounding by indication, we analyzed effect preference administer heparin, defined as percentage a center, outcome. Results- One thousand four hundred eighty-eight from 16 analyzed, whom 398 (27%) received (median dose 5000 international units). There substantial between-center variability proportion (range, 0%-94%). no significant difference those without (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.87-1.56), 1.24; 0.89-1.71), hemorrhage 1.13; 0.65-1.99), or 0.95; 0.66-1.38). Analysis level showed that better higher percentages 1.07 per 10% more 1.01-1.13). Conclusions- Substantial exists treatment, but is safe. Centers using often had A randomized trial needed further study these effects.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (23)
CITATIONS (17)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....