Assessments of Chinese Fengyun Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS) Measurements for Weather and Climate Applications

• DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-11-00023.1
• Publication Date: 2011-06-03T17:48:29Z
• Authors: X. Zou; X. Wang; F. Weng; G. Li
• Keywords: 13. Climate action; 0207 environmental engineering; 02 engineering and technology; 7. Clean energy; 01 natural sciences; 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Abstract After the successful launches of the first two polar-orbiting satellites in a new Fengyun-3 (FY-3) series, FY-3A/B, into a morning- and afternoon-configured orbit in May 2008 and November 2010, respectively, China will launch its next three polar-orbiting satellites before 2020. The Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS) on the FY-3A/B satellites has four channels that have the same channel frequency as channels 3, 5, 7, and 9 of Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-A (AMSU-A). Thus, the quality of the brightness temperature measurements from the FY-3A MWTS can be assessed using the AMSU-A brightness temperature observations from the NOAA-18 satellite. Overall, MWTS data compare favorably with AMSU-A data in terms of its global bias to NWP simulations. The standard deviations of global MWTS brightness temperatures are slightly larger than those of AMSU-A data. The scan-angle dependence of the brightness temperature bias is found to be symmetric for MWTS channel 3 as well as AMSU-A channel 7, and asymmetric for MWTS channels 2 and 4 and AMSU-A channels 5 and 9; there is a warm (cold) bias located at the beginning (end) of a scan line for all asymmetric channels except for MWTS channel 4. A major difference between the two instruments is that the MWTS biases in channels 3 and 4 are negative in low latitudes and positive in high latitudes, while the AMSU-A biases are negative in all latitudes. A detailed analysis of the data reveals that such a difference is closely related to the difference in the temperature dependence of biases between the two instruments. The AMSU-A biases are independent of the scene temperature, but MWTS biases vary with the earth scene brightness temperature. The root cause of the bias could be a combination of several factors, including solar contamination on its calibration target, detector nonlinearity, and the center frequency drift. This study further demonstrates the utility of a well-calibrated radiometer like AMSU-A for the assessment of a new instrument with NWP fields that are used as inputs to forward radiative transfer simulations.