Outcome of Dysthymic Disorder at 5-Year Follow-Up: The Effect of Familial Psychopathology, Early Adversity, Personality, Comorbidity, and Chronic Stress

Adult Personality Inventory 05 social sciences Social Support Comorbidity Social Environment Personality Disorders Severity of Illness Index Self Concept 3. Good health Life Change Events Surveys and Questionnaires Chronic Disease Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Prospective Studies Dysthymic Disorder Stress, Psychological Follow-Up Studies
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1864 Publication Date: 2002-10-11T18:10:43Z
ABSTRACT
This study sought to identify predictors of course and outcome in dysthymic disorder.Eighty-six outpatients with early-onset dysthymic disorder (before age 21) participated in a prospective 5-year follow-up study. Family history of psychopathology, early home environment, axis I and II comorbidity, social support, and chronic stress were assessed at baseline. The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were used in the follow-up assessments conducted at 30 and 60 months.Comorbid anxiety disorder, cluster C and depressive personality features, and chronic stress were associated with a lower rate of recovery from dysthymic disorder, while family history of bipolar disorder was associated with a higher probability of recovery. Family history of dysthymic disorder, poor childhood maternal and paternal relationships, childhood sexual abuse, cluster C features, neuroticism, a history of anxiety and eating disorders, and chronic stress predicted higher levels of depression at follow-up. Multivariate models indicated that almost all domains contributed to the prediction of course and outcome.The course and outcome of dysthymic disorder is best conceptualized within a multifactorial framework, with family history of psychopathology, early adversity, axis I and II comorbidity, and chronic stress all making important contributions.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (33)
CITATIONS (79)