Toward enhanced decentralized palliative care services in Neno District, Malawi: a qualitative study.
Male
Adult
Malawi
Family medicine
FOS: Political science
Health Professions
Social Sciences
FOS: Law
Nursing
FOS: Health sciences
Health Services Accessibility
Focus group
FOS: Economics and business
Psychological Impact of Bereavement and Grief
Sociology
Qualitative research
Health Sciences
Humans
Psychology
Business
Political science
Qualitative Research
Aged
Marketing
And Rural Health Services
Shared Decision Making in Healthcare
Research
Health services accessibility
Palliative Care
Politics
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Decentralization
Health care
RC952-1245
Integration of Palliative Care in End-of-Life
Quality of Dying
Health personnel
Focus Groups
Middle Aged
Social science
FOS: Sociology
FOS: Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Special situations and conditions
General Health Professions
Palliative care
Medicine
Female
Law
DOI:
10.1186/s12904-024-01455-x
Publication Date:
2024-05-23T02:01:34Z
AUTHORS (12)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background Palliative care remains key in assisting patients who have life-threatening conditions. In most low- and middle-income countries, it is often offered through a centralized system with limitations, including Malawi. 2014, the World Health Organization called for improving palliative access primary health community models. Malawi Neno District subsequently decentralized delivery to local centers. This qualitative study explored decentralization of services District, Methods The descriptive was conducted between 2021 2022 two conveniently selected centers providing District. Fourteen healthcare workers were purposefully participate focus groups. Fifteen participated three Data analyzed using deductive inductive approaches. Focused group discussions Chichewa (Malawi’s official language), audio recorded, transcribed, translated into English, thematically. Results Four main themes emerged from Patients described positive relationships built on trust holistic over time. Accessing included transport, social support, time constraints, distance issues. Facilities effectively responded needs coordinated follow-up. Decentralization perceived benefit by reducing travel challenges efficient inclusive services. However, resources, distance, support remained. Limitations sampling missing participant details necessitate further research broader sampling. Conclusion Overall, provides empirical evidence that can optimize similar low-resource contexts informing policies address barriers
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (43)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....