Toward enhanced decentralized palliative care services in Neno District, Malawi: a qualitative study.

Male Adult Malawi Family medicine FOS: Political science Health Professions Social Sciences FOS: Law Nursing FOS: Health sciences Health Services Accessibility Focus group FOS: Economics and business Psychological Impact of Bereavement and Grief Sociology Qualitative research Health Sciences Humans Psychology Business Political science Qualitative Research Aged Marketing And Rural Health Services Shared Decision Making in Healthcare Research Health services accessibility Palliative Care Politics Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Decentralization Health care RC952-1245 Integration of Palliative Care in End-of-Life Quality of Dying Health personnel Focus Groups Middle Aged Social science FOS: Sociology FOS: Psychology Clinical Psychology Special situations and conditions General Health Professions Palliative care Medicine Female Law
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01455-x Publication Date: 2024-05-23T02:01:34Z
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background Palliative care remains key in assisting patients who have life-threatening conditions. In most low- and middle-income countries, it is often offered through a centralized system with limitations, including Malawi. 2014, the World Health Organization called for improving palliative access primary health community models. Malawi Neno District subsequently decentralized delivery to local centers. This qualitative study explored decentralization of services District, Methods The descriptive was conducted between 2021 2022 two conveniently selected centers providing District. Fourteen healthcare workers were purposefully participate focus groups. Fifteen participated three Data analyzed using deductive inductive approaches. Focused group discussions Chichewa (Malawi’s official language), audio recorded, transcribed, translated into English, thematically. Results Four main themes emerged from Patients described positive relationships built on trust holistic over time. Accessing included transport, social support, time constraints, distance issues. Facilities effectively responded needs coordinated follow-up. Decentralization perceived benefit by reducing travel challenges efficient inclusive services. However, resources, distance, support remained. Limitations sampling missing participant details necessitate further research broader sampling. Conclusion Overall, provides empirical evidence that can optimize similar low-resource contexts informing policies address barriers
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (43)
CITATIONS (0)