Anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entrance points and superior gluteal artery

• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0713-5
• Publication Date: 2018-01-18T07:31:54Z
• Authors: Yong Zhao; Libo You; Wei Lian; Dexin Zou; Shengjie Dong; Tao Sun; Shudong Zhang; Dan Wang; Jingning Li; Wenliang Li; Yuchi Zhao
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Computed Tomography Angiography; Bone Screws; Diseases of the musculoskeletal system; Pelvis; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Aged; Orthopedic surgery; Aged, 80 and over; Superior gluteal artery; CTA; Sacroiliac Joint; Arteries; Middle Aged; Sacroiliac screw; RC925-935; Buttocks; Female; Anatomy; Tomography, Spiral Computed; RD701-811; Research Article

To conduct radiologic anatomical study on the relation between S1 sacroiliac screws' entry points and the route of the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches with the aim to provide the anatomical basis and technical reference for the avoidance of damage to the superior gluteal artery during the horizontal sacroiliac screw placement.Superior gluteal artery CTA (CT angiography) vascular imaging of 74 healthy adults (37 women and 37 men) was done with 128-slice spiral CT (computed tomography). The CT attendant-measuring software was used to portray the "safe bony entrance area" (hereinafter referred to as "Safe Area") of the S1 segment in the standard lateral pelvic view of three-dimensional reconstruction. The anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws' Safe Area and the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches was observed and recorded. The number of cases in which artery branches intersected the Safe Area was counted. The cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area were identified, and the shortest distance between the Safe Area and the superior gluteal artery branch closest to the Safe Area was measured.Three cases out of the 74 sample cases were excluded from this study as they were found to have no bony space for horizontal screw placement in S1 segment. Among the remaining 71 sample cases, there are 32 cases (45.1%) where the deep superior branch of superior gluteal artery passes through the Safe Area of S1 entrance point. There was no distinguishing feature and rule on how the deep superior branches and the Safe Area overlapped. In the 39 cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area, the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery were the branches closest to the Safe Area and the part of the branch closest to the Safe Area was located in front of the widest part of the Safe Area. The shortest distance between the deep superior branch and the Safe Area is 0.86 ± 0.84 cm.There is a high risk of accidental injury of the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery in the process of S1 sacroiliac screw placement. Even if the entry points are located in the safe bony entrance area, the absolute secure placement cannot be assured. We suggest that great attention should be paid to make thorough preoperative plans.