Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction
Adult
Male
0301 basic medicine
Adolescent
Endpoint Determination
NEUROBLASTOMA PATIENTS
610
RISK STRATIFICATION
Neuroblastoma
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
REPRODUCIBILITY
Tumor Cells, Cultured
BREAST-CANCER
Humans
TRANSCRIPTOME
Child
GENE-EXPRESSION
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Settore BIO/11 - BIOLOGIA MOLECOLARE
EXPRESSION-BASED CLASSIFICATION
Models, Genetic
Sequence Analysis, RNA
Research
Gene Expression Profiling
SIGNATURE
Infant, Newborn
Biology and Life Sciences
Infant
600
PROSTATE-CANCER
3. Good health
DIFFERENTIATION
Child, Preschool
Female
DOI:
10.1186/s13059-015-0694-1
Publication Date:
2015-06-24T14:57:11Z
AUTHORS (76)
ABSTRACT
Abstract
Background
Gene expression profiling is being widely applied in cancer research to identify biomarkers for clinical endpoint prediction. Since RNA-seq provides a powerful tool for transcriptome-based applications beyond the limitations of microarrays, we sought to systematically evaluate the performance of RNA-seq-based and microarray-based classifiers in this MAQC-III/SEQC study for clinical endpoint prediction using neuroblastoma as a model.
Results
We generate gene expression profiles from 498 primary neuroblastomas using both RNA-seq and 44 k microarrays. Characterization of the neuroblastoma transcriptome by RNA-seq reveals that more than 48,000 genes and 200,000 transcripts are being expressed in this malignancy. We also find that RNA-seq provides much more detailed information on specific transcript expression patterns in clinico-genetic neuroblastoma subgroups than microarrays. To systematically compare the power of RNA-seq and microarray-based models in predicting clinical endpoints, we divide the cohort randomly into training and validation sets and develop 360 predictive models on six clinical endpoints of varying predictability. Evaluation of factors potentially affecting model performances reveals that prediction accuracies are most strongly influenced by the nature of the clinical endpoint, whereas technological platforms (RNA-seq vs. microarrays), RNA-seq data analysis pipelines, and feature levels (gene vs. transcript vs. exon-junction level) do not significantly affect performances of the models.
Conclusions
We demonstrate that RNA-seq outperforms microarrays in determining the transcriptomic characteristics of cancer, while RNA-seq and microarray-based models perform similarly in clinical endpoint prediction. Our findings may be valuable to guide future studies on the development of gene expression-based predictive models and their implementation in clinical practice.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (39)
CITATIONS (320)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....