COVID-19 Social Science and Public Engagement Action Research in Vietnam, Indonesia and Nepal (SPEAR): Protocol for a mixed methods study exploring the experiences and impacts of COVID-19 for healthcare workers and vulnerable communities
Economics and Econometrics
Public relations
FOS: Political science
Social Sciences
Nursing
Infectious disease (medical specialty)
FOS: Health sciences
Focus group
Public engagement
Livelihood
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Impacts of COVID-19 on Global Economy and Markets
Sociology
Qualitative research
Pathology
Psychology
Disease
Political science
Public health
Pandemic
Geography
Agriculture
Social science
FOS: Sociology
FOS: Psychology
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Clinical Psychology
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Environmental health
Social Isolation
Archaeology
Health
Anthropology
Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health
Psychotherapist
Factors Affecting Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance
Medicine
Mental health
DOI:
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17314.1
Publication Date:
2021-12-20T10:15:07Z
AUTHORS (41)
ABSTRACT
Background: When the novel coronavirus – SARS-CoV-2 – started to spread globally, there was a call for social and behavioral scientists to conduct research to explore the wider socio-cultural contexts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), to understand vulnerabilities, as well as to increase engagement within communities to facilitate adoption of public health measures. In this manuscript, we describe the protocol for a study conducted in Indonesia, Nepal, and Vietnam. In the study, we explore how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting individuals and their communities. We focus on the wider health and economic impacts of COVID-19, in particular emerging and increased burden on mental health, as well as new or deepened vulnerabilities in the communities. The introduction of vaccines has added another layer of complexity and highlights differences in acceptance and inequalities around access. Methods: We use mixed methods, combining survey methods and social media surveillance to gain a picture of the general situation within each country, with in-depth qualitative methods to gain a deeper understanding of issues, coupled with a synergistic engagement component. We also include an exploration of the role of social media in revealing or driving perceptions of the pandemic more broadly. Participants include health workers and members of communities from 13 sites across the three countries. Data collection is spread across two phases. Phase 1 is concerned with exploring lived experiences, impacts on working lives and livelihoods, mental health and coping strategies. Phase 2 is concerned with acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines, factors that increase and reduce acceptance, and factors that influence access. Conclusions: We will disseminate findings in multiple ways including short reports and policy briefs, articles in peer-reviewed journals, and digital diaries will be edited into short films and uploaded onto social media sites.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (36)
CITATIONS (4)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....