Estimating Regional Spatial and Temporal Variability of PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Information
Aerosols
Air Pollutants
550
Research
Optical Devices
AOD
PM2.5
15. Life on land
GOES
Satellite Communications
01 natural sciences
GAM
Meteorology
GASP
RUC
13. Climate action
spatial synoptic classification
11. Sustainability
Particulate Matter
satellite aerosol remote sensing
Environmental Monitoring
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
DOI:
10.1289/ehp.0800123
Publication Date:
2009-01-27T21:35:21Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
Studies of chronic health effects due to exposures to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters <or= 2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) are often limited by sparse measurements. Satellite aerosol remote sensing data may be used to extend PM(2.5) ground networks to cover a much larger area.In this study we examined the benefits of using aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieved by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) in conjunction with land use and meteorologic information to estimate ground-level PM(2.5) concentrations.We developed a two-stage generalized additive model (GAM) for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PM(2.5) concentrations in a domain centered in Massachusetts. The AOD model represents conditions when AOD retrieval is successful; the non-AOD model represents conditions when AOD is missing in the domain.The AOD model has a higher predicting power judged by adjusted R(2) (0.79) than does the non-AOD model (0.48). The predicted PM(2.5) concentrations by the AOD model are, on average, 0.8-0.9 microg/m(3) higher than the non-AOD model predictions, with a more smooth spatial distribution, higher concentrations in rural areas, and the highest concentrations in areas other than major urban centers. Although AOD is a highly significant predictor of PM(2.5), meteorologic parameters are major contributors to the better performance of the AOD model.GOES aerosol/smoke product (GASP) AOD is able to summarize a set of weather and land use conditions that stratify PM(2.5) concentrations into two different spatial patterns. Even if land use regression models do not include AOD as a predictor variable, two separate models should be fitted to account for different PM(2.5) spatial patterns related to AOD availability.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (28)
CITATIONS (386)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....