Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients: Complications and Outcomes

Adult Male Time Factors Adolescent Science Bacteremia Comorbidity 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Renal Dialysis Risk Factors Prevalence Humans Referral and Consultation Aged Retrospective Studies Aged, 80 and over Incidence Q R Middle Aged 3. Good health Survival Rate Medicine Kidney Failure, Chronic Female Peritoneal Dialysis Research Article
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166181 Publication Date: 2016-11-08T13:40:41Z
ABSTRACT
Background Several studies have suggested that urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a feasible alternative to hemodialysis (HD) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but the impact of modality on outcome, especially short-term complications, has not been directly evaluated. The aim current study was compare complications and outcomes PD HD ESRD patients. Methods In this retrospective study, who initiated urgently without pre-established functional vascular access or catheter at single center from January 2013 December 2014 were included. Patients grouped according their (PD HD). Each patient followed for least 30 days after insertion (until 2016). Dialysis-related survival compared between two groups. Results Our enrolled 178 (56.2% male), whom 96 82 groups, respectively. Compared patients, had more cardiovascular disease, less heart failure, higher levels serum potassium, hemoglobin, albumin, pre-albumin, lower brain natriuretic peptide. There no significant differences gender, age, use steroids, early referral nephrologist, prevalence primary diseases, co-morbidities, other laboratory characteristics incidence dialysis-related during first significantly than probability bacteremia an independent predictor (30-day) complications. difference respect rate. Conclusion experienced center, safe urgent need dialysis.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (25)
CITATIONS (60)