Effective coverage of essential antenatal care interventions: A cross-sectional study of public primary healthcare clinics in the West Bank

• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212635
• Publication Date: 2019-02-22T18:39:18Z
• Authors: Mahima Venkateswaran; Binyam Bogale; Khadija Abu Khader; Tamara Awwad; Ingrid K. Friberg; Buthaina Ghanem; Taghreed Hijaz; Kjersti Mørkrid; J. Frederik Frøen
• Keywords: Adult; Primary Health Care; Science; Q; R; Prenatal Care; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; 0302 clinical medicine; Pregnancy; Medicine; Electronic Health Records; Humans; Female; Registries; Israel; Delivery of Health Care; Research Article

The proportion of women attending four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits is widely used for monitoring, but provides limited information on quality of care. Effective coverage metrics, assessing if ANC interventions are completely delivered, can identify critical gaps in healthcare service delivery. We aimed to measure coverage of at least one screening and effective coverage of ANC interventions in the public health system in the West Bank, Palestine, and to explore associations between infrastructure-related and maternal sociodemographic variables and effective coverage.We used data from paper-based clinical records of 1369 pregnant women attending ANC in 17 primary healthcare clinics. Infrastructure-related variables were derived from a 2014 national inventory assessment of clinics. Sample size calculations were made to detect effective coverage ranging 40-60% with a 2-3% margin of error, clinics were selected by probability sampling. We calculated inverse probability weighted percentages of: effective coverage of appropriate number and timing of screenings of ANC interventions; and coverage of at least one screening.Coverage of one screening and effective coverage of ANC interventions were notably different for screening for: hypertension (98% vs. 10%); fetal growth abnormalities (66% vs. 6%); anemia (93% vs. 14%); gestational diabetes (93% vs. 34%), and antenatal ultrasound (74% vs. 24%). Clinics with a laboratory and ultrasound generally performed better in terms of effective coverage, and maternal sociodemographic factors had no associations with effective coverage estimates. Only 13% of the women attended ANC visits according to the recommended national schedule, driving effective coverage down.Indicators for ANC monitoring and their definitions can have important consequences for quantifying health system performance and identifying issues with care provision. To achieve more effective coverage in public primary care clinics in the West Bank, efforts should be made to improve care provision according to prescribed guidelines.