Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids

• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238511
• Publication Date: 2020-09-17T18:02:10Z
• Authors: Toral J. Parikh; Krysttel C. Stryczek; Chris Gillespie; George G. Sayre; Laura Feemster; Edmunds Udris; Barbara Majerczyk; Seppo T. Rinne; Renda Soylemez Wi...; David H. Au; Christian D. Helf...
• Keywords: Male; Primary Health Care; Science; Q; R; 3. Good health; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 03 medical and health sciences; Deprescriptions; 0302 clinical medicine; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Surveys and Questionnaires; Administration, Inhalation; Medicine; Humans; Female; Prescription Drug Overuse; Research Article

Despite evidence of possible patient harm and substantial costs, medication overuse is persistent. Patient reaction is one potential barrier to deprescribing, but little research has assessed this in specific instances of medication discontinuation. We sought to understand Veteran and provider experience when de-implementing guideline-discordant use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in those with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).We conducted a mixed-methods analysis in a provider-randomized quality improvement project testing a proactive electronic-consultation from pulmonologists recommending ICS discontinuation when appropriate. PCPs at two Veterans Health Administration healthcare systems were included. We completed interviews with 16 unexposed providers and 6 intervention-exposed providers. We interviewed 9 patients within 3 months after their PCP proposed ICS discontinuation. We conducted inductive and deductive content analysis of qualitative data to explore an emergent theme of patient reaction. Forty-eight PCPs returned surveys (24 exposed and 24 unexposed, response rate: 35%).The unexposed providers anticipated their patients might resist ICS discontinuation because it seems counterintuitive to stop something that is working, patient's fear of worsening symptoms, or if the prescription was initiated by another provider. Intervention-exposed providers reported similar experiences in post-intervention interviews. Unexposed providers anticipated that patients may accept ICS discontinuation, citing tactical use of patient-centered care strategies. This was echoed by intervention-exposed providers who had successfully discontinued an ICS. Veterans reported acceding to their providers out of trust or deference to their advanced training, even after describing an ICS as a 'security blanket'. Our survey findings supported the subthemes from our interviews. Among providers who proposed discontinuation of an ICS, 76% reported that they were able to discontinue it or switch to another more appropriate medication.While PCPs anticipated that patients would resist discontinuing an ICS, interviews with patient and intervention-exposed PCPs along with surveys suggest that patients were receptive to this change.