The gestational diabetes future diabetes prevention study (GODDESS): A partially randomised feasibility controlled trial

• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273992
• Publication Date: 2022-12-30T18:51:58Z
• Authors: Judith Parsons; Rita Forde; Anna Brackenridge; Katharine F. Hunt; Khalida Ismail; Trevor Murrells; Anna Reid; Helen Rogers; Rebecca Rogers; Angus Forbes
• Keywords: Lifestyle intervention; Science; Q; Postpartum Period; R; 610; Motivational Interviewing; Type 2 Diabetes; Pregnancy lifestyle intervention; 3. Good health; Diabetes, Gestational; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Pregnancy; Weight Loss; Medicine; Humans; Feasibility Studies; Female; Diabetes prevention; weight loss; Gestational diabetes; Research Article

ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility of an ante- and post-natal lifestyle intervention for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) to reduce type 2 diabetes risk.DesignA partially randomised patient preference feasibility trial.SettingDiabetes antenatal clinics in two inner-London hospitals, UK.ParticipantsPregnant women ≥18 years with a GDM diagnosis and pre-pregnancy body mass index of ≥25kg/m2.InterventionParticipants in the intervention group were offered four motivational interview-based sessions (two antenatally and two postnatally, at 3 and 6 months postpartum), a WhatsApp support group, a FitBit and electronic self-help resources.Outcome measuresRecruitment; retention; intervention dose received; data completion; adaptions; proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss; weight change, blood glucose; blood pressure; diet, physical activity, breastfeeding and depression. Clinical outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 months postpartum.Results50 participants were recruited from 155 eligible women (32% recruitment rate). Thirty-four were recruited to the intervention group (23 following randomisation (RI-group) and 11 based on preference (PI-group)); and 16 to the control group (13 randomised (RC-group) and 3 preference (PC-group)). Attrition was 44% (n = 22/50). Forty-six percent (n = 6) of the intervention group (25% (n = 2) of the RI-group and 80% (n = 4) of the PI-group) achieved ≥5% weight loss compared to 8% (n = 1) in the control group (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.69 to 0.07). Mean weight change was -2.1kg±9.0 in the intervention group (0kg±5.4 in the RI-group and -5.4kg±13.0 in the PI-group) compared to +4.4kg±4.9 in the control group (RC +4.4kg ±5.3 and PC +4.7kg ±3.1, 95% CI -12.4 to 0.2).ConclusionsRecruitment was feasible, but strategies to improve retention are needed. The findings suggest the intervention can support women with GDM to lose weight. The observed weight loss was primarily in women who preferred the intervention. Therefore, future trials may need to adopt a preference design and consider factors associated with preference.Trial registrationTrial registration:ISRCTN52675820https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN52675820?q=ISRCTN52675820&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.