A Comparison Of Hospital Administrative Costs In Eight Nations: US Costs Exceed All Others By Far

• DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327
• Publication Date: 2014-09-08T13:13:01Z
• Authors: David U. Himmelstein; Miraya Jun; Reinhard Busse; Karine Chevreul; Alexander Geissler; Patrick Jeurissen; Sarah Thomson; Marie-Amelie Vinet; Steffie Woolhandler
• Keywords: Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Canada; 330; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; PAYMENT; HOSPITAL COSTS; MARKETS; COSTS AND SPENDING; MEDICARE; 03 medical and health sciences; PHYSICIANS; 0302 clinical medicine; SYSTEMS OF CARE; Hospital Administration; Germany; Humans; Netherlands; Wales; PRESCRIPTION DRUG; health sciences; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; Organizational Policy; United States; 3. Good health; England; Scotland; Costs and Cost Analysis; France; COSTS

A few studies have noted the outsize administrative costs of US hospitals, but no research has compared these costs across multiple nations with various types of health care systems. We assembled a team of international health policy experts to conduct just such a challenging analysis of hospital administrative costs across eight nations: Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. We found that administrative costs accounted for 25.3 percent of total US hospital expenditures--a percentage that is increasing. Next highest were the Netherlands (19.8 percent) and England (15.5 percent), both of which are transitioning to market-oriented payment systems. Scotland and Canada, whose single-payer systems pay hospitals global operating budgets, with separate grants for capital, had the lowest administrative costs. Costs were intermediate in France and Germany (which bill per patient but pay separately for capital projects) and in Wales. Reducing US per capita spending for hospital administration to Scottish or Canadian levels would have saved more than $150 billion in 2011. This study suggests that the reduction of US administrative costs would best be accomplished through the use of a simpler and less market-oriented payment scheme.