Learning-Induced Plasticity in Auditory Spatial Representations Revealed by Electrical Neuroimaging

• DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0764-07.2007
• Publication Date: 2007-05-16T16:55:41Z
• Authors: Lucas Spierer; Eric Tardif; Holger Sperdin; Micah M. Murray; Stephanie Clarke
• Keywords: Adult; Auditory Cortex; Male; 0301 basic medicine; Neuronal Plasticity; Electroencephalography; 03 medical and health sciences; Acoustic Stimulation; Acoustic Stimulation; Adult; Auditory Cortex; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Female; Humans; Learning; Male; Neuronal Plasticity; Psychomotor Performance; Reaction Time; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Reaction Time; Humans; Learning; Female; Psychomotor Performance

Auditory spatial representations are likely encoded at a population level within human auditory cortices. We investigated learning-induced plasticity of spatial discrimination in healthy subjects using auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) and electrical neuroimaging analyses. Stimuli were 100 ms white-noise bursts lateralized with varying interaural time differences. In three experiments, plasticity was induced with 40 min of discrimination training. During training, accuracy significantly improved from near-chance levels to ∼75%. Before and after training, AEPs were recorded to stimuli presented passively with a more medial sound lateralization outnumbering a more lateral one (7:1). In experiment 1, the same lateralizations were used for training and AEP sessions. Significant AEP modulations to the different lateralizations were evident only after training, indicative of a learning-induced mismatch negativity (MMN). More precisely, this MMN at 195–250 ms after stimulus onset followed from differences in the AEP topography to each stimulus position, indicative of changes in the underlying brain network. In experiment 2, mirror-symmetric locations were used for training and AEP sessions; no training-related AEP modulations or MMN were observed. In experiment 3, the discrimination of trained plus equidistant untrained separations was tested psychophysically before and 0, 6, 24, and 48 h after training. Learning-induced plasticity lasted <6 h, did not generalize to untrained lateralizations, and was not the simple result of strengthening the representation of the trained lateralizations. Thus, learning-induced plasticity of auditory spatial discrimination relies on spatial comparisons, rather than a spatial anchor or a general comparator. Furthermore, cortical auditory representations of space are dynamic and subject to rapid reorganization.