Authorship Issues in Publishing and Career Development Workshop

• DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9309
• Publication Date: 2014-09-25T19:39:19Z
• Authors: Patricia O'Sullivan; Sheila Chauvin; Fred Wolf; Deborah Richardson; Maria Blanco
• Keywords: Presentation (obstetrics)

OPEN ACCESSJanuary 16, 2013Authorship Issues in Publishing and Career Development Workshop Patricia O'Sullivan, EdD, Sheila Chauvin, PhD, Fred Wolf, Deborah Richardson, Maria Blanco, EdD University of California, San Francisco, School Medicine Google Scholar More articles by this author , PhD Louisiana State Health Sciences Center Washington Georgia Regents Tufts https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9309 SectionsAboutAbstract ToolsDownload Citations ShareFacebookTwitterEmail AbstractAbstract Introduction: Authoring publishing manuscripts for publication may expose junior scholars to challenging professional ethical situations. Faculty members are often advised determine authorship order when they start a manuscript, but there times it not be possible follow. Dialogue discussion various authoring scenarios will help faculty clarify these issues develop broad repertoire responses the inevitable dilemmas. To prepare resource we sought guidance from literature standards that have been perpetrated groups. Methods: This is two-part development workshop. One part PowerPoint presentation other set 48 with responses. We include three ways which resources can used depending on context level experience learners. In all combinations learners review actual experiences variety discuss arise. Results: workshop, at time guide was written, had given different settings instructors each using variation. initial offering, 90% participants strongly agreed/agreed session useful. Similarly educational fellows 100% workshop prepared them make decisions about authorship. For an offering students strategy two, those who responded (100%) brief survey thought were helpful comments included: “It very useful presentation-example cases worked great”, “[The information] provided validation my position share coauthors.” Discussion: While believe successes attest versatility users should attentive adjustments need make. Based learner satisfaction reports both full short versions modified changing scenario cards, developing alternative novices experienced individuals, obtained ratings individuals customize their use scenarios. Educational Objectives By end session, able to: Explain guidelines authorship.Identify range dilemmas arise publishing.Apply strategies address challenges during processes. Sign up latest publications MedEdPORTAL Add your email below FILES INCLUDEDReferencesRelatedDetails INCLUDED Included publication: Instruction Guide Academia.pdf Academia.pptx view components, extract (i.e., unzip) downloaded .zip file. Download editor’s noteThis contain technology or display format no longer use. Copyright & Permissions© 2013 O'Sullivan et al. open-access distributed under terms Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.KeywordsAuthorship GuidelinesPublishing Disclosures None report. Funding/Support Loading ...