Minimizing Drift in Electrical Conductivity Measurements in High Temperature Environments using the EM‐38

• DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.3390
• Publication Date: 2014-01-16T17:06:40Z
• Authors: D. A. Robinson; I. Lebron; S. M. Lesch; P. Shouse
• Keywords: 13. Climate action; 0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries; 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences

The EM‐38 is a noninvasive instrument, commonly used for monitoring salinity, mapping bulk soil properties, and evaluating soil nutrient status. Users in the Southwest USA have observed as much as 20% “drift” in the measurement of bulk soil electrical conductivity (ECa) with this instrument. This drift has usually been ignored or compensated for by statistical procedures. We performed laboratory and field experiments to determine if the drift is due to calibration instability of the instrument or to heating of the instrument by the sun. In laboratory experiments, after a warm‐up period, the instrument provided constant readings in the range 25 to 40°C; above 40°C the response of the instrument was unpredictable. In field experiments, where we placed the EM‐38 in a fixed location we observed an unexpected response at air temperatures below 40°C. Temperature sensors in different locations on the instrument demonstrated that temperature differences between the instrument's transmitting and receiving coils and the control panel (CP) were as great as 20°C. As the instrument is temperature compensated from this CP, erroneous compensation occurred when the instrument was placed in direct sunlight. In this study, we demonstrate that differential heating of the EM‐38 is one cause of drift and erroneous bulk electrical conductivity measurement; shading the instrument substantially reduced this problem, effectively extending the reliable working temperature range by minimizing drift.