Ethnic Segregation and Public Goods: Evidence from Indonesia
05 social sciences
1. No poverty
10. No inequality
0506 political science
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.3001672
Publication Date:
2017-09-06T21:36:46Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
This article contributes to the study of ethnic diversity and public goods provision by assessing the role of the spatial distribution of ethnic groups. Through a new theory that we callspatial interdependence, we argue that the segregation of ethnic groups can reduce or even neutralize the “diversity penalty” in public goods provision that results from ethnic fractionalization. This is because local segregation allows communities to use disparities in the level of public goods compared with other communities as leverage when advocating for more public goods for themselves, thereby ratcheting up the level of public goods across communities. We test this prediction on highly disaggregated data from Indonesia and find strong support that, controlling for ethnic fractionalization, segregated communities have higher levels of public goods. This has an important and underexplored implication: decentralization disadvantages integrated communities vis-à-vis their more segregated counterparts.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (19)
CITATIONS (3)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....