Eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an exacerbation marker

Male Neutrophils Clinical Decision-Making International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Diseases of the respiratory system Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 03 medical and health sciences exacerbation 0302 clinical medicine Predictive Value of Tests Eosinophilia Humans Lymphocyte Count Lymphocytes chronic respiratory failure neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio Lung Original Research Aged RC705-779 Middle Aged Prognosis 3. Good health Eosinophils Cross-Sectional Studies ROC Curve Area Under Curve Disease Progression Female Respiratory Insufficiency peripheral eosinophilia.
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s147261 Publication Date: 2017-11-22T22:26:52Z
ABSTRACT
Aim: Increased dyspnea, sputum volume, and purulence are subjective symptoms in COPD patients. To diagnose exacerbations with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) to assess the requirement for antibiotic treatment, physicians require more objective criteria. We aimed investigate whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be used as an infectious exacerbation marker patients CRF. Patients methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed intensive care outpatient clinic of a tertiary training hospital between 2014 2015. admitted CRF due who had complete blood count (CBC) results were enrolled. CBC C-reactive protein (CRP) levels obtained from online database. The "modified model (MEM)" defined follows: A, leukocytes ≥12,000/mm 3 , CRP >10 mg/dL; B, ≥10,000/mm C, >8 D, >5 mg/dL. cutoff value NLR each model. split into two groups based on according "NLR model" further subgrouped peripheral eosinophil percentage (eosinophils ≥2% <2%) compared MEM. Results: A total 1,066 (430 females, 40.3%), mean age 66±13 years, included. 3.54 (NLR ≥3.54, n=366, 34%) showed highest sensitivity specificity (78%, 69%), B (63%, 71%), C (61%, 72%), D (58%, 72%). Peripheral eosinophilia (PE ≥2%) present 48 (4.5%). PE <2% ≥3.54 group significantly higher MEM ( P <0.001). Conclusion: presents attractive option its simplicity cost-effectiveness. In CRF, where is <2%, present, treatment should considered. Keywords: COPD, exacerbation, failure, ratio,
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (18)