Measuring the Burden of Infodemics: Summary of the Methods and Results of the Fifth WHO Infodemic Management Conference (Preprint)
Thematic Analysis
Global Health
DOI:
10.2196/preprints.44207
Publication Date:
2022-11-16T14:37:12Z
AUTHORS (59)
ABSTRACT
<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> An infodemic is excess information, including false or misleading that spreads in digital and physical environments during a public health emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by an unprecedented global led to confusion about the benefits of medical interventions, with substantial impact on risk-taking health-seeking behaviors, eroding trust authorities compromising effectiveness responses policies. Standardized measures are needed quantify harmful impacts systematic methodologically robust manner, as well harmonizing highly divergent approaches currently explored for this purpose. This can serve foundation systematic, evidence-based approach monitoring, identifying, mitigating future harms emergency preparedness prevention. </sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> In paper, we summarize Fifth World Health Organization (WHO) Infodemic Management Conference structure, proceedings, outcomes, proposed actions seeking identify interdisciplinary frameworks enable measurement burden infodemics. <title>METHODS</title> iterative human-centered design (HCD) concept mapping were used facilitate focused discussions allow generation actionable outcomes recommendations. included 86 participants representing diverse scientific disciplines from 28 countries across all WHO regions, along observers civil society health–implementing partners. A thematic map capturing concepts matching key contributing factors infodemics was throughout conference frame contextualize discussions. Five areas immediate action identified. <title>RESULTS</title> 5 development metrics assess associated interventions (1) developing standardized definitions ensuring adoption thereof; (2) improving influencing infodemics; (3) conducting review evidence, tools, data sources; (4) setting up technical working group; (5) addressing priorities postpandemic recovery resilience building. summary report consolidated group input toward common vocabulary terms, concepts, study designs, measures, tools estimate management interventions. <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Standardizing basis documenting systems population emergencies. Investment into practical, affordable, evidence-based, methods legally ethically balanced monitoring generating diagnostics, insights, recommendations; action-oriented guidance, policies, support options, mechanisms, managers program managers.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (23)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....