Additive Effects of Genetic Variation in GCK and G6PC2 on Insulin Secretion and Fasting Glucose

• DOI: 10.2337/db09-0228
• Publication Date: 2009-09-10T01:47:25Z
• Authors: Xia Li; Yu-Hsiang Shu; Anny H. Xiang; Enrique Trigo; Johanna Kuusisto; Jaana Hartiala; Amy J. Swift; Miwa Kawakubo; Heather M. Stringham; Lori L. Bonnycastle; Jean M. Lawrence; Markku Laakso; Hooman Allayee; Thomas A. Buchanan; Richard M. Watanabe
• Keywords: Adult; Blood Glucose; Male; 0301 basic medicine; 0303 health sciences; Genetic Variation; Fasting; Middle Aged; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Germinal Center Kinases; 03 medical and health sciences; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin Secretion; Mexican Americans; Glucose-6-Phosphatase; Humans; Insulin; Original Article; Female; Aged

OBJECTIVE Glucokinase (GCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit 2 (G6PC2) regulate the glucose-cycling step in pancreatic β-cells and may regulate insulin secretion. GCK rs1799884 and G6PC2 rs560887 have been independently associated with fasting glucose, but their interaction on glucose-insulin relationships is not well characterized.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We tested whether these variants are associated with diabetes-related quantitative traits in Mexican Americans from the BetaGene Study and attempted to replicate our findings in Finnish men from the METabolic Syndrome in Men (METSIM) Study.

RESULTS rs1799884 was not associated with any quantitative trait (corrected P > 0.1), whereas rs560887 was significantly associated with the oral glucose tolerance test 30-min incremental insulin response (30′ Δinsulin, corrected P = 0.021). We found no association between quantitative traits and the multiplicative interaction between rs1799884 and rs560887 (P > 0.26). However, the additive effect of these single nucleotide polymorphisms was associated with fasting glucose (corrected P = 0.03) and 30′ Δinsulin (corrected P = 0.027). This additive association was replicated in METSIM (fasting glucose, P = 3.5 × 10−10 30′ Δinsulin, P = 0.028). When we examined the relationship between fasting glucose and 30′ Δinsulin stratified by GCK and G6PC2, we noted divergent changes in these quantitative traits for GCK but parallel changes for G6PC2. We observed a similar pattern in METSIM.

CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that variation in GCK and G6PC2 have additive effects on both fasting glucose and insulin secretion.