Geographical Variation in Diabetes Prevalence and Detection in China: Multilevel Spatial Analysis of 98,058 Adults

• DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1100
• Publication Date: 2014-10-29T06:19:04Z
• Authors: Maigeng Zhou; Thomas Astell-Burt; Yufang Bi; Xiaoqi Feng; Yong Jiang; Yichong Li; Andrew Page; Limin Wang; Yu Xu; Linhong Wang; Wenhua Zhao; Guang Ning
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Rural Population; China; 571; Adolescent; Urban Population; analysis; prevalence; detection; Social and Behavioral Sciences; 058; Education; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; socioeconomics; 0302 clinical medicine; multilevel; XXXXXX - Unknown; adults; Diabetes Mellitus; Prevalence; geographical; Humans; Epidemiology/Health Services Research; Aged; Spatial Analysis; diabetes; Geography; Data Collection; 380; Middle Aged; 98; 3. Good health; spatial; Socioeconomic Factors; Female; variation; china

OBJECTIVE To investigate the geographic variation in diabetes prevalence and detection in China.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Self-report and biomedical data were collected from 98,058 adults aged ≥18 years (90.5% response) from 162 areas spanning mainland China. Diabetes status was assessed using American Diabetes Association criteria. Among those with diabetes, detection was defined by prior diagnosis. Choropleth maps were used to visually assess geographical variation in each outcome at the provincial level. The odds of each outcome were assessed using multilevel logistic regression, with adjustment for person- and area-level characteristics.

RESULTS Geographic visualization at the provincial level indicated widespread variation in diabetes prevalence and detection across China. Regional prevalence adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) ranged from 8.3% (95% CI 7.2%, 9.7%) in the northeast to 12.7% (11.1%, 14.6%) in the north. A clear negative gradient in diabetes prevalence was observed from 13.1% (12.0%, 14.4%) in the urban high-SEC to 8.7% (7.8%, 9.6%) in rural low-SEC counties/districts. Adjusting for health literacy and other person-level characteristics only partially attenuated these geographic variations. Only one-third of participants living with diabetes had been previously diagnosed, but this also varied substantively by geography. Regional detection adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural SEC, for example, spanned from 40.4% (34.9%, 46.3%) in the north to 15.6% (11.7%, 20.5%) in the southwest. Compared with detection of 40.8% (37.3%, 44.4%) in urban high-SEC counties, detection was poorest among rural low-SEC counties at just 20.5% (17.7%, 23.7%). Person-level characteristics did not fully account for these geographic variations in diabetes detection.

CONCLUSIONS Strategies for addressing diabetes risk and improving detection require geographical targeting.