A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Glucose Control During Moderate-Intensity, High-Intensity, and Resistance Exercise With Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery While Profiling Potential Additional Signals in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

• DOI: 10.2337/dc21-1593
• Publication Date: 2021-11-17T18:30:16Z
• Authors: Barbora Paldus; Dale Morrison; Dessi P. Zaharieva; Melissa H. Lee; Hannah Jones; Varuni Obeyesekere; Jean Lu; Sara Vogrin; André La Gerche; Sybil A. McAuley; Richard J. MacIsaac; Alicia J. Jenkins; Glenn M. Ward; Peter Colman; Carmel E.M. Smart; Rowen Seckold; Bruce R. King; Michael C. Riddell; David N. O’Neal
• Keywords: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Resistance Training; 03 medical and health sciences; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Insulin Infusion Systems; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin

OBJECTIVE To compare glucose control with hybrid closed-loop (HCL) when challenged by high intensity exercise (HIE), moderate intensity exercise (MIE), and resistance exercise (RE) while profiling counterregulatory hormones, lactate, ketones, and kinetic data in adults with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was an open-label multisite randomized crossover trial. Adults with type 1 diabetes undertook 40 min of HIE, MIE, and RE in random order while using HCL (Medtronic MiniMed 670G) with a temporary target set 2 h prior to and during exercise and 15 g carbohydrates if pre-exercise glucose was <126 mg/dL to prevent hypoglycemia. Primary outcome was median (interquartile range) continuous glucose monitoring time-in-range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL) for 14 h post–exercise commencement. Accelerometer data and venous glucose, ketones, lactate, and counterregulatory hormones were measured for 280 min post–exercise commencement.

RESULTS Median TIR was 81% (67, 93%), 91% (80, 94%), and 80% (73, 89%) for 0–14 h post–exercise commencement for HIE, MIE, and RE, respectively (n = 30), with no difference between exercise types (MIE vs. HIE; P = 0.11, MIE vs. RE, P = 0.11; and HIE vs. RE, P = 0.90). Time-below-range was 0% for all exercise bouts. For HIE and RE compared with MIE, there were greater increases, respectively, in noradrenaline (P = 0.01 and P = 0.004), cortisol (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001), lactate (P ≤ 0.001 and P ≤ 0.001), and heart rate (P = 0.007 and P = 0.015). During HIE compared with MIE, there were greater increases in growth hormone (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS Under controlled conditions, HCL provided satisfactory glucose control with no difference between exercise type. Lactate, counterregulatory hormones, and kinetic data differentiate type and intensity of exercise, and their measurement may help inform insulin needs during exercise. However, their potential utility as modulators of insulin dosing will be limited by the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous insulin delivery.