Pure Ormocer vs Methacrylate Composites on Posterior Teeth: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

• DOI: 10.2341/19-079-c
• Publication Date: 2020-02-13T19:07:07Z
• Authors: CRG Torres; MG Augusto; IF Mathias-Santam...; R Di Nicoló; AB Borges
• Keywords: Acid etching

Clinical Relevance The clinical behavior of pure ormocer composite is reliable when used in class II restorations after 24 months evaluation. SUMMARY Objective: aim this study was to evaluate the performance made using and methacrylate composites a period months, split-mouth double-blinded randomized design. Methods Materials: Thirty patients received two (n=60) performed with different composites: GrandioSO (methacrylate, nanohybrid) Admira Fusion (pure ormocer, nanohybrid). universal adhesive system (Futurabond M+) applied all self-etching mode. were placed by incremental technique. evaluated FDI World Dental Federation criteria 7 days 6, 12, postoperatively. Results: After 23 attended recall 46 evaluated. Fisher's statistical analysis (5%) showed no difference between materials. One restoration one presented small fractures. Only tooth suffered fracture remaining structure. presented, respectively, 100%, 95.66%, 100% acceptable general scores for esthetic, functional, biological properties. 91.31%, 95.66% same scores. Conclusion: 24-month follow-up, nonsignificant differences tested detected. Both materials provided restorations.