Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences
Bayes factor; Efficiency; Hypothesis testing; Optional stopping; Sequential designs;
330
05 social sciences
150
Bayes Theorem
Social and Behavioral Sciences
FOS: Psychology
Research Design
Bayes factor; Efficiency; Hypothesis testing; Optional stopping; Sequential designs; Psychology (miscellaneous)
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Sample Size
Humans
Psychology
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Probability
DOI:
10.31219/osf.io/w3s3s
Publication Date:
2018-07-02T10:51:37Z
AUTHORS (4)
ABSTRACT
Unplanned optional stopping rules have been criticized for inflating Type I error rates under the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm. Despite these criticisms this research practice is not uncommon, probably as it appeals to researcher’s intuition to collect more data in order to push an indecisive result into a decisive region. In this contribution we investigate the properties of a procedure for Bayesian hypothesis testing that allows optional stopping with unlimited multiple testing, even after each participant. In this procedure, which we call Sequential Bayes Factors (SBF), Bayes factors are computed until an a priori defined level of evidence is reached. This allows flexible sampling plans and is not dependent upon correct effect size guesses in an a priori power analysis. We investigated the long-term rate of misleading evidence, the average expected sample sizes, and the biasedness of effect size estimates when an SBF design is applied to a test of mean differences between two groups. Compared to optimal NHST, the SBF design typically needs 50% to 70% smaller samples to reach a conclusion about the presence of an effect, while having the same or lower long-term rate of wrong inference.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (4)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....