Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study)

• DOI: 10.3310/hta21350
• Publication Date: 2017-06-26T08:33:38Z
• Authors: Mark B Gabbay; Adele Ring; Richard Byng; Pippa Anderson; Rod S Taylor; Caryn Matthews; Tirril Harris; Vashti Berry; Paula Byrne; Elliot Carter; Pam Clarke; Laura Cocking; Suzanne Edwards; Richard Emsley; Mauro Fornasiero; Lucy Frith; Shaun Harris; Peter Huxley; Siw Jones; Peter Kinderman; Michael King; Liv Kosnes; Daniel Marshall; Dave Mercer; Carl May; Debbie Nolan; Ceri Phillips; Tim Rawcliffe; Alexandra V Sardani; Elizabeth Shaw; Sam Thompson; Jane Vickery; Brian Wainman; Mark Warner
• Keywords: Adult; Counseling; Male; Social Work; Substance-Related Disorders; Cost-Benefit Analysis; 610; Pilot Projects; citizens advice; State Medicine; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Medical technology; Humans; R855-855.5; debt; Aged; Depressive Disorder; Primary Health Care; Patient Selection; Health Services; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; 16. Peace & justice; United Kingdom; 3. Good health; counselling; Mental Health; Patient Satisfaction; pilot randomised controlled trial; depression; Quality of Life; Female

BackgroundDepression and debt are common in the UK. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer) aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the addition of a primary care debt counselling advice service to usual care for patients with depression and debt. However, the study was terminated early during the internal pilot trial phase because of recruitment delays. This report describes the rationale, methods and findings of the pilot study, and implications for future research.ObjectivesThe overarching aim of the internal pilot was to identify and resolve problems, thereby assessing the feasibility of the main trial. The specific objectives were to confirm methods for practice recruitment and the ability to recruit patients via the proposed approaches; to determine the acceptability of the study interventions and outcome measures; to assess contamination; to confirm the randomisation method for main trial and the level of participant attrition; and to check the robustness of data collection systems.DesignAn adaptive, parallel, two-group multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial with a nested mixed-methods process and economic evaluation. Both individual- and cluster (general practice)-level were was used in the pilot phase to assign participants to intervention or control groups.SettingGeneral practices in England and Wales.ParticipantsIndividuals were included who were aged ≥ 18 years, scored ≥ 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory II and self-identified as having debt worries. The main exclusion criteria were being actively suicidal or psychotic and/or severely depressed and unresponsive to treatment; having a severe addiction to alcohol/illicit drugs; being unable/unwilling to give written informed consent; currently participating in other research including follow-up phases; having received Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) debt advice in the past year; and not wanting debt advice via a general practice.InterventionsThe participants in the intervention group were given debt advice provided by the CAB and shared biopsychosocial assessment, in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) and two debt advice leaflets. The participants in the control group were given advice leaflets provided by the general practitioner and TAU only.Main outcome measures(1) Outcomes of the pilot trial – the proportion of eligible patients who consented, the number of participants recruited compared with target, assessment of contamination, and assessment of patient satisfaction with intervention and outcome measures. (2) Participant outcomes – primary – Beck Depression Inventory II; secondary – psychological well-being, health and social care utilisation, service satisfaction, substance misuse, record of priority/non-priority debts, life events and difficulties, and explanatory measures. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation) and at 4 months post randomisation. Other data sources – qualitative interviews were conducted with participants, clinicians and CAB advisors.ResultsOf the 238 expressions of interest screened, 61 participants (26%) were recruited and randomised (32 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group). All participants provided baseline outcomes and 52 provided the primary outcome at 4 months’ follow-up (14.7% dropout). Seventeen participants allocated to the intervention saw a CAB advisor. Descriptive statistics are reported for participants with complete outcomes at baseline and 4 months’ follow-up. Our qualitative findings suggest that the relationship between debt and depression is complex, and the impact of each on the other is compounded by other psychological, social and contextual influences.ConclusionsAs a result of low recruitment, this trial was terminated at the internal pilot phase and was too small for inferential statistical analysis. We recommend ways to reduce this risk when conducting complex trials among vulnerable populations recruited in community settings. These cover trial design, the design and delivery of interventions, recruitment strategies and support for sites.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN79705874.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 35. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Mark Gabbay and Adele Ring are part-funded by NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North West Coast and Richard Byng and Rod S Taylor, Vashti Berry and Elizabeth Shaw part-funded by NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula.