Extension and Severity of Self-Reported Side Effects of Seven COVID-19 Vaccines in Mexican Population

Adult systemic effects COVID-19 Vaccines Adolescent Population Social Sciences Logistic regression Comorbidity Infectious disease (medical specialty) Coronavirus Disease 2019 Research FOS: Health sciences Coronavirus Disease 2019 03 medical and health sciences Sociology Health Sciences Humans Confounding Disease Mexico Internal medicine BNT162 Vaccine Demography local effects Vaccines 0303 health sciences Ad26COVS1 SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Odds ratio Middle Aged vaccination FOS: Sociology 3. Good health Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) side effects Cross-Sectional Studies Infectious Diseases Environmental health Health Medicine Factors Affecting Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance Female Public Health Self Report Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.834744 Publication Date: 2022-03-14T08:54:47Z
ABSTRACT
A few studies examined the comparative side effects of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccines. We compared extension and severity self-reported seven COVID-19 vaccines [BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences), Gam-COVID-Vac (Gamaleya's Sputnik V), Ad5-nCoV (CanSinoBIO), Ad26.CoV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen)] in Mexican population. also evaluated association type vaccine, sex, age, comorbidity, history allergies to extent effects. This was a cross-sectional study carried out online between August 12 September 3, 2021 Mexico. The first inclusion criterion receive vaccine second, being at least 18 years old. survey link distributed via multiple social media platforms. questioned about symptoms based on short-term reported literature. Side effect classified as local, systemic, or both. asked need take medicine, stop activities/miss work, seek medical attention. Then, index constructed responses. Descriptive stepwise multivariate logistic ordinal regression analyses were used calculate odds ratio (OR) 95% CI for each outcome adjusted by potential confounders. mean age 38.9 ± 11.0 ( n = 4,024). Prevalence one varied number doses. At dose 1, with highest rate (85%) followed (80%). Both associated greater (adjusted OR 2.53, 2.16, 2.96 2.41, 1.76, 3.29, respectively) 4.32, 3.73, 5.00 3.00, 2.28, 3.94, respectively). Young (<50 years), female severity, independent 2, (88%) only 2.88, 1.59, 5.21) 3.14, 1.82, 5.43). Continuous are necessary acknowledge more post-vaccine different populations.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (50)
CITATIONS (19)