Machine Learning Based Prediction of Insufficient Herbage Allowance with Automated Feeding Behaviour and Activity Data

• DOI: 10.3390/s19204479
• Publication Date: 2019-10-17T08:46:06Z
• Authors: Abu Zar Shafiullah; Jessica Werner; Emer Kennedy; Lorenzo Leso; Bernadette O’Brien; Christina Umstätter
• Keywords: 2. Zero hunger; binary classification; Chemical technology; binary classification; feeding behaviour and activities; herbage allowance; machine learning; precision pasture management; Body Weight; Decision Making; precision pasture management; TP1-1185; Feeding Behavior; 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences; Animal Feed; Article; Machine Learning; 0403 veterinary science; Eating; machine learning; Milk; herbage allowance; feeding behaviour and activities; Animals; Lactation; Cattle; Female

Sensor technologies that measure grazing and ruminating behaviour as well as physical activities of individual cows are intended to be included in precision pasture management. One of the advantages of sensor data is they can be analysed to support farmers in many decision-making processes. This article thus considers the performance of a set of RumiWatchSystem recorded variables in the prediction of insufficient herbage allowance for spring calving dairy cows. Several commonly used models in machine learning (ML) were applied to the binary classification problem, i.e., sufficient or insufficient herbage allowance, and the predictive performance was compared based on the classification evaluation metrics. Most of the ML models and generalised linear model (GLM) performed similarly in leave-out-one-animal (LOOA) approach to validation studies. However, cross validation (CV) studies, where a portion of features in the test and training data resulted from the same cows, revealed that support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) performed relatively better than other candidate models. In general, these ML models attained 88% AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve) and around 80% sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision and F-score. This study further identified that number of rumination chews per day and grazing bites per minute were the most important predictors and examined the marginal effects of the variables on model prediction towards a decision support system.