Non-native Listeners’ Recognition of High-Variability Speech Using PRESTO

Variation (astronomy)
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.9 Publication Date: 2014-11-20T04:41:14Z
ABSTRACT
Background: Natural variability in speech is a significant challenge to robust successful spoken word recognition. In everyday listening environments, listeners must quickly adapt and adjust multiple sources of both the signal environments. High-variability may be particularly difficult understand for non-native listeners, who have less experience with second language (L2) phonological system detailed knowledge sociolinguistic variation L2. Purpose: The purpose this study was investigate effects high-variability sentences on recognition explore underlying individual differences abilities listeners. Research Design: Participants completed two sentence tasks involving low-variability sentences. They also battery behavioral self-report questionnaires designed assess their indexical processing skills, vocabulary knowledge, several core neurocognitive abilities. Study Sample: Native speakers Mandarin (n = 25) living United States recruited from Indiana University community participated current study. A native comparison group consisted scores obtained English 21) taken an earlier Data Collection Analysis: Speech conditions assessed task using PRESTO (Perceptually Robust Sentence Test Open-Set) mixed 6-talker multitalker babble. HINT (Hearing Noise Test) Indexical skills were measured talker discrimination task, gender forced-choice regional dialect categorization task. Vocabulary WordFam familiarity test, executive functioning BRIEF-A (Behavioral Rating Inventory Executive Function – Adult Version) questionnaire. Scores compared tested previous examined differences. Results: Non-native keyword significantly lower than listeners’ tasks. Differences performance between larger HINT, although varied by signal-to-noise ratio. groups differed ability categorize talkers region origin knowledge. Individual accuracy babble at more favorable ratios found related subscales composite scores. However, not categorization, discrimination, or Conclusions: challenging Difficulty under testing lack L2, especially L2 information, among weaknesses affecting control life.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (19)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....