Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Tumor Tissue DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Palliative First-Line Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy

• DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.016
• Publication Date: 2024-04-29T01:31:05Z
• Authors: Seung-been Lee; Ji-Won Kim; Hong-Geun Kim; Sung-Hyun Hwang; Kui-Jin Kim; Ju Hyun Lee; Jeongmin Seo; Minsu Kang; Eun Hee Jung; Koung Jin Suh; Se Hyun Kim; Jin Won Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Nak-Jung Kwon; Keun-Wook Lee
• Keywords: Male; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Palliative Care; DNA, Neoplasm; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Circulating Tumor DNA; Mutation; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Original Article; Female; Longitudinal Studies; Neoplasm Metastasis; Colorectal Neoplasms; Aged

Purpose This study aimed to compare tumor tissue DNA (ttDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to explore the clinical applicability of ctDNA and to better understand clonal evolution in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing palliative first-line systemic therapy.Materials and Methods We performed targeted sequencing analysis of 88 cancer-associated genes using germline DNA, ctDNA at baseline (baseline-ctDNA), and ctDNA at progressive disease (PD-ctDNA). The results were compared with ttDNA data.Results Among 208 consecutively enrolled patients, we selected 84 (41 males; median age, 59 years; range, 35 to 90 years) with all four sample types available. A total of 202 driver mutations were found in 34 genes. ttDNA exhibited the highest mutation frequency (n=232), followed by baseline-ctDNA (n=155) and PD-ctDNA (n=117). Sequencing ctDNA alongside ttDNA revealed additional mutations in 40 patients (47.6%). PD-ctDNA detected 13 novel mutations in 10 patients (11.9%) compared to ttDNA and baseline-ctDNA. Notably, seven mutations in five patients (6.0%) were missense or nonsense mutations in APC, TP53, SMAD4, and CDH1 genes. In baseline-ctDNA, higher maximal variant allele frequency (VAF) values (p=0.010) and higher VAF values of APC (p=0.012), TP53 (p=0.012), and KRAS (p=0.005) mutations were significantly associated with worse overall survival.Conclusion While ttDNA remains more sensitive than ctDNA, our ctDNA platform demonstrated validity and potential value when ttDNA was unavailable. Post-treatment analysis of PD-ctDNA unveiled new pathogenic mutations, signifying cancer’s clonal evolution. Additionally, baseline-ctDNA’s VAF values were prognostic after treatment.