Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law /
Carbon storage ; GHG emissions ; Nature based solutions ; Nature restoration law ; Peatland forestry ; Peatland restoration
Nature restoration law
restoration
Ecology
peatland restoration
Forestry
peatland forestry
carbon storage
01 natural sciences
Peatland forestry
GHG emissions
Chemistry
Carbon storage
Biological sciences
Nature based solutions
FOS: Biological sciences
Perspective
nature restoration law
nature based solutions
Biology
Peatland restoration
peatlands
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.7831174
Publication Date:
2024-05-02
AUTHORS (38)
ABSTRACT
AbstractThe EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO2 sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES ()
CITATIONS ()
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....