Risk Stratification for 2-Year Mortality in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

• DOI: 10.5551/jat.57711
• Publication Date: 2020-07-22T22:09:34Z
• Authors: Yosuke Hata; Osamu Iida; Mitsutoshi Asai; Masaharu Masuda; Shin Okamoto; Takayuki Ishihara; Kiyonori Nanto; Takashi Kanda; Takuya Tsujumura; Shota Okuno; Yasuhiro Matsuda; Mitsuyoshi Takahara; Toshiaki Mano
• Keywords: Aged, 80 and over; Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; Male; Time Factors; Endovascular Procedures; Middle Aged; Limb Salvage; Risk Assessment; Body Mass Index; 3. Good health; Survival Rate; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Renal Dialysis; Humans; Original Article; Female; Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies

The latest Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) recommend assessing the 2-year mortality risk in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) before revascularization. This study aimed to reveal whether the Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification, developed originally as a risk assessment tool for limb prognosis, would be useful in predicting the 2-year mortality risk in patients with CLTI in the era of GVG and WIfI.We retrospectively analyzed 849 patients with CLTI who were primarily treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) between April 2010 and December 2016. The impact of baseline characteristics, including the WIfI classification on mortality risk, was investigated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.During a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, 243 deaths were observed. The 2-year mortality rate was 32.3%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that WIfI classification stages (p=0.037), in addition to male sex (p=0.010), age (p＜0.001), non-ambulatory status (p＜0.001), body mass index (p=0.002), and hemodialysis (p＜0.001), were independent predictors for an increased risk of mortality, while the Rutherford classification was not.WIfI classification stages were independently associated with mortality risk in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT, while the Rutherford classification was not. The WIfI classification would be a practical tool for planning the revascularization strategy in CLTI treatment.