[Clinical features and prognosis of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia children in South China: a multicenter study].

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin Idarubicin Core binding factor
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20230224-00126 Publication Date: 2023-10-02
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the clinical features, efficacy and prognosis factors of core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) children in South China. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Clinical data 584 AML patients from 9 hospitals between January 2015 to December 2020 collected. According fusion gene results, all were divided into two groups: CBF-AML group (189 cases) non-CBF-AML (395 cases). AML1-ETO subgroup (154 CBFβ-MYH11 (35 Patients chosen different induction scheme A (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony stimulating idarubicin (FLAG-IDA) scheme, 134 B (daunorubicin, cytarabine etoposide (DAE) 55 Age, gender, response rate, recurrence mortality, molecular genetic characteristics other compared groups. Kaplan-Meier method used for survival analysis curve drawn. Cox regression model prognostic factors. Results: total diagnosed, including 346 males 238 females. And 189 with included, 117 72 The age diagnosis 7.3 (4.5,10.0)years, white blood cell count at initial 21.4 (9.7, 47.7)×109/L.The complete remission rate first course (CR1) therapy, relapse mortality significantly those (91.0% (172/189) vs. 78.0% (308/395); 10.1% (19/189) 18.7% (74/395); 13.2% (25/189) 25.6% (101/395), P<0.05). In CBF-AML, had higher cells lower proportion extramedullary invasion than subgroup, statistical significance (65.7% (23/35) 14.9% (23/154), 2.9% (1/35) 16.9% (26/154), both more additional chromosome abnormalities (75/154), especially sex loss (53/154). Compared B, tumor reduction regimen, (50.0% (67/134) 29.1% (16/55), 34.3% (46/134) 18.2% (10/55), Significant differences found 5-years event free (EFS) 5-year overall (OS) ((77.0±6.4)%vs. (61.9±6.7)%,(83.7±9.0)%vs. (67.3±7.2)%, P<0.05).EFS OS rates not (both P>0.05). Multivariate showed CR1 high (≥50×109/L) independent risk EFS (HR=0.24, 95%CI 0.07-0.85,HR=1.01, 1.00-1.02, P<0.05) 0.06-0.87; HR=1.01, 1.00-1.02; Conclusions: is common which has involvement abnormalities, loss. similar that CBFβ-MYH11. selection regimen FLAG-IDA abnormality can improve prognosis.目的: 分析华南地区儿童核心结合因子(CBF)相关急性髓系白血病(AML)的临床特征及预后相关因素。 方法: 回顾性队列研究。分析2015年1月至2020年12月华南急性髓系白血病协作组的9个医学中心确诊的584例初诊AML患儿的临床资料,根据融合基因结果分为CBF-AML组(189例)与非CBF-AML组(395例),其中CBF-AML组患儿分为AML1-ETO亚组(154例)与CBFβ-MYH11亚组(35例),根据诱导方案非随机选择结果分为A组[FLAG-IDA(氟达拉滨+去甲氧柔红霉素+阿糖胞苷+粒细胞集落刺激因子)方案,134例]及B组[DAE方案(柔红霉素+阿糖胞苷+依托泊苷),55例],分析各组患儿的年龄、性别、缓解率、复发率、病死率、分子遗传特征等临床资料并进行组间比较,采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析并绘制生存曲线,Cox回归模型进行预后因素分析。 结果: 584例AML患儿中男346例、女238例,其中CBF-AML患儿共189例,男117例、女72例,诊断年龄为7.3(4.5,10.0)岁,初诊时白细胞计数为21.4(9.7,47.7)×109/L,CBF-AML患儿第1个疗程诱导治疗完全缓解率、复发率及病死率与非CBF-AML组相比,差异均有统计学意义[91.0%(172/189)比78.0%(308/395),10.1%(19/189)比18.7%(74/395),13.2%(25/189)比25.6%(101/395),均P<0.05]。CBF-AML患儿中CBFβ-MYH11亚组与AML1-ETO亚组相比,初发白细胞计数≥50×109/L的比例更高,髓外浸润比例更低,差异均有统计学意义[65.7%(23/35)比14.9%(23/154),2.9%(1/35)比16.9%(26/154),均P<0.05],AML1-ETO亚组容易发生附加染色体异常(75/154),其中性染色体缺失最常见(53/154)。与B组相比,A组附加染色体异常及使用减瘤方案的比例更高,差异均有统计学意义[50.0%(67/134)比29.1%(16/55),34.3%(46/134)比18.2%(10/55),均P<0.05]。CBF-AML组5年无事件生存率(EFS)、5年总生存率(OS)均优于非CBF-AML组[(77.0±6.4)%比(61.9±6.7)%,(83.7±9.0)%比(67.3±7.2)%,均P<0.05]。CBF-AML患儿中AML1-ETO亚组与CBFβ-MYH11亚组的EFS及OS差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。AML1-ETO亚组患儿多因素分析显示第1次完全缓解率和初始白细胞计数高(≥50×109/L)均是影响EFS[HR=0.24,95%CI 0.07~0.85;HR=1.01,95%CI 1.00~1.02;均P<0.05]及OS[HR=0.24,95%CI 0.06~0.87;HR=1.01,95%CI 1.00~1.02;均P<0.05]的独立危险因素。 结论: 儿童CBF-AML以AML1-ETO为主,有更高的髓外浸润,容易发生附加染色体异常,尤其是性染色体缺失,AML1-ETO与CBFβ-MYH11患儿预后相当。针对白细胞计数高及附加染色体异常患儿,选择诱导方案FLAG-IDA可改善预后。.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES ()
CITATIONS ()
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....