A5010229710- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Respiratory viral infections research
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Health
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Social Media in Health Education
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Agriculture and Farm Safety
University of Alberta
2016-2025
University of Toronto
2025
Cochrane
2015-2024
Women and Children’s Health Research Institute
2021-2024
Alberta Hospital Edmonton
2015-2022
Pediatrics and Genetics
2022
George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation
2018
Research Canada
2013-2017
Hospital de Santa Maria
2017
Stollery Children's Hospital
2009-2016
Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow systematic approach to map evidence on topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses extension Reviews) checklist explanation. The was developed by 24-member expert panel 2 research leads following published guidance from EQUATOR...
Social media has had a profound effect on how children and adolescents interact. While there are many benefits to the use of social media, cyberbullying emerged as potential harm, raising questions regarding its influence mental health.To review existing publications that examine health-related effects via among adolescents.We searched 11 electronic databases from January 1, 2000, through 17, 2012 (updated June 24, 2014). Studies were screened by 2 independent reviewers included if they...
To develop a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews healthcare interventions.Development the preferred items (PRIOR) statement.Core team (seven individuals) led day-to-day operations, and an expert advisory group (three provided methodological advice. A panel 100 experts (authors, editors, readers including members public or patients) was invited to participate in modified Delphi exercise. 11 panellists (chosen on basis expertise, representing relevant stakeholder groups) were take...
<b>Objectives</b> To evaluate the risk of bias tool, introduced by Cochrane Collaboration for assessing internal validity randomised trials, inter-rater agreement, concurrent compared with Jadad scale and Schulz approach to allocation concealment, relation between effect estimates. <b>Design</b> Cross sectional study. <b>Study sample</b> 163 trials in children. <b>Main outcome measures</b> Inter-rater agreement reviewers using tool (weighted κ), time apply other approaches quality assessment...
Systematic reviews (SRs) are an important source of information about healthcare interventions. A key component a well-conducted SR is comprehensive literature search. There limited evidence on the contribution non-English reports, unpublished studies, and dissertations their impact results meta-analyses.Our sample included SRs from three Cochrane Review Groups: Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI), Infectious Diseases (ID), Developmental Psychosocial Learning Problems (DPLP) (n = 129)....