Richard E. Niemeyer

ORCID: 0000-0002-1058-253X
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
  • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
  • Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Emile Durkheim and Sociology
  • Psychology of Development and Education
  • Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

United States Air Force Academy
2022-2024

Community College of Denver
2020

Avila University
2019

University of Colorado Denver
2019

University of California, Riverside
2012

This study uses Bayesian simulations to estimate the probability that published criminological research findings are wrong. Toward this end, we employ two equations originally popularized in John P.A. Ioannidis' (in)famous article, "Why Most Published Research Findings False." Values for relevant parameters were determined using recent estimates field's average level of statistical power, bias, factionalization, and quality theory. According our simulations, there is a very high most...

10.1177/0306624x221132997 article EN International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2022-11-16

This study uses Bayesian simulations to estimate the probability that published criminological research findings are wrong. Toward this end, we employ two equations originally popularized in John P.A. Ioannidis’ (in)famous article, “Why Most Published Research Findings False.” Values for relevant parameters were determined using recent estimates field’s average level of statistical power, bias, factionalization, and quality theory. According our simulations, there is a very high most...

10.31219/osf.io/mhv8f preprint EN 2022-09-17

Like other social sciences, criminology is experiencing a theory crisis as part of larger replication crisis. Niemeyer and colleagues (2022) estimate the impact weak criminological on false positive findings using Ioannidis equation find that likely at least 90% are positives. Weak directly contributes to methods-based flexible operationalization poor reproducibility findings. To better quantify problem, we calculate index qualitative variation (IQV) for theoretical constructs in sample...

10.21428/cb6ab371.93c97ca6 article EN cc-by-nc-nd CrimRxiv 2024-03-26

Criminology has recently begun to grapple with concerns about the replication crisis, but current efforts focus on addressing methodological and analytical along questionable research practices. Causes of however, occur at every link in derivation chain, from theory empirical test interpretation results reporting Psychology—which been wrestling its own crisis since least 2010s—has recognize these early-chain causes thus turned attention towards "theory crisis": finding that most...

10.21428/cb6ab371.7c56d280 preprint EN CrimRxiv 2024-07-03

Growing concerns about the reproducibility of scientific findings have led to efforts enhance transparency and rigor criminological research. Improving accuracy precision theory development adopting open science practices, such as data, are widely considered effective means achieve these ends. However, current practices primarily target quantitative methodologies tend ignore qualitative methods, like document analysis, due perceived insurmountable obstacles. Since analysis is often crucial...

10.21428/cb6ab371.839ce044 preprint EN cc-by-nc-nd CrimRxiv 2024-08-13

A vision for the future of space exploration and operation is one in which people live work as members human–multi-agent teams, comprised humans, robots, other artificially intelligent agents. As such, people’s opinions on robotics AI, especially those who will likely be users such systems, should taken into account system requirements, design, implementation. This analyzes interviews conducted with U.S. Space Force (USSF) Guardians to ascertain these opinions. Overall, USSF expressed an...

10.1177/10711813241277526 article EN Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2024-08-30

In the wake of 2016 U.S. presidential election and U.K. Brexit referendum, field misinformation studies has rapidly expanded, leading to increased scholarly activity significant public attention. However, this growth been accompanied by substantial criticisms, particularly regarding need for greater consensus on defining key concepts, inadequate conceptual differentiation, low coherence within field. The ongoing replication crisis in social sciences further underscores urgent clearly defined...

10.21428/cb6ab371.9772d72d preprint EN cc-by-nc-nd CrimRxiv 2024-10-09

The works of [Cha-DunAlvInoNieCarFieLaw,Cha-Dun] describe upward sweeps in populations city-states and attempt to characterize such phenomenon. model proposed both [TurKor,Tur] describes how the population, state resources internal conflict influence each other over time. We show that one can obtain an sweep population by altering particular parameters system differential equations constituting given [TurKor,Tur]. Moreover, we a has unstable critical point propose approach for determining...

10.48550/arxiv.1504.04688 preprint EN other-oa arXiv (Cornell University) 2015-01-01

10.1086/724979 article EN American Journal of Sociology 2023-07-01
Coming Soon ...