Judith L. Capper

ORCID: 0000-0002-4320-7752
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Bioenergy crop production and management

Harper Adams University
2002-2024

Benchmark Animal Health (United Kingdom)
2024

Washington State University
2010-2015

Huntsman (United States)
2015

Cornell University
2008-2012

University of British Columbia
2010

Iowa State University
2010

University of Georgia
2010

Michigan State University
2010

American Association of Bovine Practitioners
2010

A common perception is that pasture-based, low-input dairy systems characteristic of the 1940s were more conducive to environmental stewardship than modern milk production systems. The objective this study was compare impact (2007) US with historical practices as exemplified by system in 1944. deterministic model based on metabolism and nutrient requirements herd used estimate resource inputs waste outputs per billion kg milk. Both modeled using management practices, population dynamics,...

10.2527/jas.2009-1781 article EN cc-by-nc Journal of Animal Science 2009-03-14

Consumers often perceive that the modern beef production system has an environmental impact far greater than of historical systems, with improved efficiency being achieved at expense greenhouse gas emissions. The objective this study was to compare (2007) US practices characteristic in 1977. A deterministic model based on metabolism and nutrient requirements population used quantify resource inputs waste outputs per billion kilograms beef. Both systems were modeled using management...

10.2527/jas.2010-3784 article EN Journal of Animal Science 2011-07-30

This study compared the environmental impact of conventional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems. A deterministic model based on metabolism nutrient requirements population was used to quantify resource inputs waste outputs per 1.0 × 10⁸ kg hot carcass weight in conventional (CON), (NAT) (GFD) Production systems were modeled using characteristic management practices, dynamics data from U.S. Increased productivity (slaughter growth rate) CON system reduced cattle size required...

10.3390/ani2020127 article EN cc-by Animals 2012-04-10

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is the preferred methodology to assess carbon footprint per unit of milk. The objective this case study was apply an LCA method compare footprints high-performance confinement and grass-based dairy farms. Physical performance data from research herds were used quantify a Irish system top-performing United Kingdom (UK) system. For US system, top 5% national database used. applied using same farm greenhouse gas (GHG) model for all systems. estimated on- off-farm GHG...

10.3168/jds.2013-7174 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Dairy Science 2014-01-18

Abstract The U.S. dairy industry considerably reduced environmental impacts between 1944 and 2007, primarily through improved cow productivity. However, although milk yield per has increased over the past decade, whole-system impact analyses have not been conducted this time period, during which modeling science considerably. objective of study was to compare cattle production in 2007–2017. A deterministic model based on population demographics, metabolism, nutrient requirements used...

10.1093/jas/skz291 article EN cc-by-nc Journal of Animal Science 2019-10-17

The environmental impact of using recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) in dairy production was examined on an individual cow, industry-scale adoption, and overall system basis. An average 2006 U.S. milk yield 28.9 kg per day used, with a daily response to rbST supplementation 4.5 cow. Rations were formulated both resource inputs (feedstuffs, fertilizers, fuels) waste outputs (nutrient excretion greenhouse gas emissions) calculated. wider systems assessed via acidification (AP),...

10.1073/pnas.0802446105 article EN Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008-07-01

The objective of this study was to quantify the environmental and economic impact withdrawing growth-enhancing technologies (GET) from U.S. beef production system. A deterministic model based on metabolism nutrient requirements population used resource inputs waste outputs per 454 × 10(6) kg beef. Two systems were compared: one using GET (steroid implants, in-feed ionophores, hormones, beta-adrenergic agonists) where approved by FDA at current adoption rates other without use. Both modeled...

10.2527/jas.2011-4870 article EN cc-by-nc Journal of Animal Science 2012-06-05

The objective of this study was to compare the environmental impact Jersey or Holstein milk production sufficient yield 500,000 t cheese (equivalent yield) both with and without recombinant bovine somatotropin use. deterministic model used 2009 DairyMetrics (Dairy Records Management Systems, Raleigh, NC) population data for composition (Jersey: 20.9 kg/d, 4.8% fat, 3.7% protein; Holstein: 29.1 3.8% 3.1% protein), age at first calving, calving interval, culling rate. Each contained lactating...

10.3168/jds.2011-4360 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Dairy Science 2011-12-20

As the global population increases, more animal protein needs to be produced using fewer resources (land, water, and energy) with a smaller carbon footprint. Improved productivity has considerably reduced footprint of dairy beef production over past century. Extensive systems intuitively appear environmentally friendly, yet scientific analysis demonstrates that intensive reduce resource use, waste output, greenhouse gas emissions per unit food. livestock continue make gains, sustainability...

10.2527/af.2011-0009 article EN cc-by-nc Animal Frontiers 2011-07-01

The present study investigated the effect of maternal vitamin E and fatty acid supplementation on lamb antioxidant status. Forty-eight ewes were fed one four concentrate diets supplemented with a basal (50 mg/kg) or supranutritional (500 level plus source either saturated fat (Megalac; Volac Ltd, Royston, Hertfordshire, UK) long-chain PUFA (fish oil) from 6 weeks prepartum until 4 postpartum. Blood samples taken lambs at intervals throughout experiment and, parturition, muscle, brain blood...

10.1079/bjn20051376 article EN British Journal Of Nutrition 2005-04-01

Supplementation of pregnant ewes with long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) demonstrably improves indicators neonatal lamb vigour, potentially improving the number lambs reared per ewe. The present study investigated effect supplementing fish oil and vitamin E (α-tocopherol acetate) throughout both pregnancy lactation on performance lactating sucking lambs. Forty-eight were supplemented one four concentrates containing either Megalac or plus a basal (50 mg/kg) supranutritional...

10.1017/s1751731107000067 article EN cc-by-nc-nd animal 2007-01-01

The objective of this study was to assess environmental impact, economic viability, and social acceptability 3 beef production systems with differing levels efficiency. A deterministic model U.S. used predict the number animals required produce 1 × 10(9) kg HCW beef. Three treatments were compared, representing average (control), a 15% increase in ADG, finishing weight (FW). For each treatment, various socioeconomic scenarios compared account for uncertainty producer consumer behavior....

10.2527/jas.2013-6632 article EN Journal of Animal Science 2013-10-21

Abstract Background A considerable body of evidence has reported the beneficial effects improving productivity on reducing environmental impacts from livestock production. However, despite negative animal diseases reproduction, growth and milk production, there is little information available upon disease greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe). This study aimed to partially address this knowledge gap by investigating globally important vaccine-preventable GHGe various systems, namely: intensive...

10.1186/s42522-023-00089-y article EN cc-by One Health Outlook 2023-12-08

Optimizing efficiency in the cow-calf sector is an important step toward improving beef sustainability. The objective of study was to use a model identify relative roles reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management minimizing production systems' environmental impact economically viable, socially acceptable manner. An economic diet optimizer used ideal systems varying genetic reproductive technology use. Eight scenarios were compared least cost baseline: average U.S. practices (CON), CON...

10.2527/jas.2014-8800 article EN Journal of Animal Science 2015-05-29
Coming Soon ...