F. Reed Johnson

ORCID: 0000-0002-7572-2150
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Microscopic Colitis
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Duke University
2016-2025

Clinical Research Institute
2016-2025

Erasmus University Rotterdam
2022

Duke University Health System
2021

Duke-NUS Medical School
2021

University of Maryland, College Park
2020

University of York
2020

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
2020

Universität Bayern
2019

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
2016

Objective. To examine preferences for HIV test methods using conjoint analysis, a method used to measure economic (utilities). Data Sources. Self‐administered surveys at four publicly funded testing locations in San Francisco, California, between November 1999 and February 2000 ( n =365, 96 percent response rate). Study Design. We defined six important attributes of tests their levels (location, price, ease collection, timeliness/accuracy, privacy/anonymity, counseling). A fractional...

10.1111/1475-6773.01115 article EN Health Services Research 2002-12-01

Abstract Aims Medication non‐adherence is particularly common in patients with Type 2 diabetes. We constructed a discrete‐choice experiment to examine the relative importance of oral glucose‐lowering medication features and estimate likely effect effectiveness side effects on adherence diabetes UK USA. Methods Preferences were elicited using cross‐sectional, web‐enabled survey. Patients self‐reported physician‐made diagnosis diabetes, who currently taking medications recruited through an...

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02696.x article EN Diabetic Medicine 2009-02-27

Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding set attributes, their levels or alternatives. It stated-preference method based on assumption that respondents are capable making judgments best and worst (or most least important, respectively) out three more elements choice-set. As true discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, avoids weaknesses rating ranking scales...

10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x article EN cc-by Health Economics Review 2016-01-07

Background: Medication nonadherence is high among patients with bipolar disorder, and may lead to poor clinical outcomes, decreased quality of life, increased resource utilization. Objective: To investigate the factors associated assess effect patient-stated preferences on stated adherence hypothetical medications. Research Design: A choice-format stated-preference Web survey was administered. In each choice question, were asked choose 2 or 3 different Each question followed by a asking...

10.1097/mlr.0b013e318040ad90 article EN Medical Care 2007-05-21

Independent applications of open-ended and dichotomous-choice formats are compared using tests means, estimating joint likelihood functions nonparametric distributions. The null hypothesis no difference in the estimates central tendency cannot be rejected for two out three data sets, while estimated standard deviations significantly different all sets. In addition, actual means exceed those from comparable synthetic suggesting either questions underestimate values or bid structures may lead...

10.2307/3147204 article EN Land Economics 1996-08-01

Objective. To compare and contrast methods findings from two approaches to valuation used in the same survey: measurement of “attitudes” using simple rankings ratings versus “preferences” conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis, a stated preference method, involves comparing scenarios composed attribute descriptions by ranking, rating, or choosing scenarios. We explore possible explanations for our focus groups conducted after quantitative survey. Methods. A self‐administered survey, measuring...

10.1111/1475-6773.01116 article EN Health Services Research 2002-12-01

This study uses stated-preference (SP) analysis to measure willingness pay (WTP) reduce acute episodes of respiratory and cardiovascular ill health. The SP survey employs a modified version the health state descriptions used in Quality Well Being (QWB) Index. four attributes are symptom, episode duration, activity restrictions cost. Preferences elicited using two different formats: graded-pair discrete-choice. formats cause subjects focus on evaluation strategies. Combining elicitation...

10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:4<295::aid-hec520>3.0.co;2-d article EN Health Economics 2000-01-01

A specialized survey of Maine households' responses to information about the risks associate d with radon concentrations in their homes and water supplies was use evaluate how they form risk perceptions. The findings support a modified Bayesian learning model describe individual s used revise Moreover, dividuals who took some mitigating actions reported lower percep tions after that action. overall results are potentially importan t programs as policy instruments for r eduction because...

10.2307/1928144 article EN The Review of Economics and Statistics 1988-02-01

10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.008 article EN publisher-specific-oa Value in Health 2016-09-01
Coming Soon ...