A5089502408- Philosophy and History of Science
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Topic Modeling
- Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Logic, programming, and type systems
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Advanced Algebra and Logic
Universidad Panamericana
2024
Sistema Nacional de Investigadores
2024
Czech Academy of Sciences
2024
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre
2011
Accounting for the epistemic contribution of deduction has been a pervasive problem logicians interested in deduction, such as, among others, Jakko Hintikka. The arises because conclusion validly deduced from set premises is said to be “contained” that set; this containment relation, would known moment are known. Assuming this, it problematic explain how we can gain knowledge by deducing logical consequence implied premises. To address problem, offer an alternative account as process...
In deduction the truth of premises guarantees conclusion because is contained in premises; that many philosophers have denied possibility gaining knowledge through or deductive reasoning, which leads to a problem known as paradox inference. To address this problem, I propose distinction between reasoning cognitive process capable generating new knowledge, and implication logical relation propositions, accounts for deduction’s validity, present scientific evidence underpin proposal. En la...
To analyze the mid-term neurodevelopment outcome in children with isolated mild (⩽ 12 mm) ventriculomegaly (VM) diagnosed fetal life, using Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening test (BDIST). Retrospective study a tertiary care center. 86 cases of VM were identified, which 68 excluded due to additional cerebral anomalies (n = 40), extra-craneal 3), chromosomal defects 4), dysmorphic syndromes congenital infections 2), termination pregnancy 9), stillbirth 2) or incomplete follow-up 4)....
Accounting for the epistemic contribution of deduction has been a pervasive problem logicians interested in deduction, such as, among others, Jakko Hintikka. The arises because conclusion validly deduced from set premises is said to be "contained" that set; this containment relation, would known moment are known. Assuming this, it problematic explain how we can gain knowledge by deducing logical consequence implied premises. To address problem, offer an alternative account as process...