Alicia P. Melis

ORCID: 0000-0003-0355-9718
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies

University College London
2019-2024

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
2006-2021

University of Warwick
2013-2019

Max Planck Society
2006-2015

Hospital Universitario La Paz
2014

Atatürk University
2014

University Hospital in Motol
2014

Charles University
2014

Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University
2014

Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University
2014

Modern theories of the evolution human cooperation focus mainly on altruism. In contrast, we propose that humans’ species-unique forms cooperation—as well as their cognition, communication, and social life—all derive from mutualistic collaboration (with selection against cheaters). a first step, humans became obligate collaborative foragers such individuals were interdependent with one another so had direct interest in well-being partners. this context, they evolved new skills motivations...

10.1086/668207 article EN Current Anthropology 2012-11-26

Humans collaborate with non-kin in special ways, but the evolutionary foundations of these collaborative skills remain unclear. We presented chimpanzees collaboration problems which they had to decide when recruit a partner and potential recruit. In an initial study, individuals recruited collaborator only solving problem required collaboration. second more effective two partners on basis their experience each them previous day. Therefore, recognizing is necessary determining who best are...

10.1126/science.1123007 article EN Science 2006-03-02

People often act on behalf of others. They do so without immediate personal gain, at cost to themselves, and even toward unfamiliar individuals. Many researchers have claimed that such altruism emanates from a species-unique psychology not found in humans' closest living evolutionary relatives, as the chimpanzee. In favor this view, few experimental studies chimpanzees produced mostly negative results. contrast, we report evidence perform basic forms helping absence rewards spontaneously...

10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184 article EN cc-by PLoS Biology 2007-06-26

Egalitarian behavior is considered to be a species-typical component of human cooperation. Human adults tend share resources equally, even if they have the opportunity keep larger portion for themselves. Recent experiments suggested that this tendency emerges fairly late in ontogeny, not before 6 or 7 years age. Here we show 3-year-old children mostly equally with peer after worked together actively obtain rewards collaboration task, when those could easily monopolized. These findings...

10.1177/0956797610395392 article EN Psychological Science 2010-12-31

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) competed with a human for food. The sat inside booth, 1 piece of food to her left and right, which she could retract from chimpanzee competitor's reach as needed. In Experiment 1, chimpanzees approach either side the booth unseen but then had through 2 tunnels (1 clear, opaque) 2, both were clear was looking away, made loud noise when it opened. preferentially reached opaque tunnel in first study silent second, successfully concealing their taking competitor...

10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.154 article EN Deleted Journal 2006-01-01

Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) sometimes help both humans and conspecifics in experimental situations which immediate selfish benefits can be ruled out. However, several experiments, chimpanzees have not provided food to a conspecific even when it would cost them nothing, leading the hypothesis that prosociality food-provisioning context is derived trait humans. Here, we show obtain non-food items—given donor cannot get herself. Furthermore, key factor eliciting chimpanzees' targeted...

10.1098/rspb.2010.1735 article EN Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2010-10-27

Inferring the evolutionary history of cognitive abilities requires large and diverse samples. However, such samples are often beyond reach individual researchers or institutions, studies limited to small numbers species. Consequently, methodological site-specific-differences across can limit comparisons between Here we introduce ManyPrimates project, which addresses these challenges by providing a large-scale collaborative framework for comparative in primate cognition. To demonstrate...

10.1371/journal.pone.0223675 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2019-10-24

10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.003 article EN Evolution and Human Behavior 2009-08-07

Many animal species cooperate, but the underlying proximate mechanisms are often unclear. We presented chimpanzees with a mutualistic collaborative food-retrieval task requiring complementary roles, and tested subjects' ability to help their partner perform her role. For each role, subjects required different tool, tools were not interchangeable. gave one individual in dyad both tools, measured willingness transfer tool as well which (correct versus incorrect) they transferred. Most helped...

10.1098/rsbl.2013.0009 article EN Biology Letters 2013-02-20

Long-term collaborative relationships require that any jointly produced resources be shared in mutually satisfactory ways. Prototypically, this sharing involves partners dividing up simultaneously available resources, but sometimes the collaboration makes a resource to only one individual, and of must take place across repeated instances over time. Here, we show beginning at 5 years age, human children stabilize cooperation such cases by taking turns obtaining resource. In contrast,...

10.1177/0956797616644070 article EN Psychological Science 2016-05-25

Abstract Human adults often show a preference for scarce over abundant goods. In this paper, we investigate whether was shared by 4‐ and 6‐year‐old children as well chimpanzees, humans’ nearest primate relative. Neither chimpanzees nor 4‐year‐olds displayed scarcity preference, but 6‐year‐olds did, especially in the presence of competitors. We conclude that is human‐unique develops humans increase their cognitive skills social experiences with peers explore different potential psychological...

10.1002/mar.21109 article EN Psychology and Marketing 2018-05-07

Successful collaboration often relies on individuals' capacity to communicate with each other. Despite extensive research chimpanzee communication, there is little evidence that chimpanzees are capable, without human training, of regulating collaborative activities via communication. This study investigated whether pairs were capable communicating ensure coordination during problem-solving. The needed two tools extract fruits from an apparatus. communicator in pair could see the location...

10.1098/rspb.2019.0408 article EN Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2019-04-17

Reputation formation is a key component in the social interactions of many animal species. An evaluation reputation drawn from two principal sources: direct experience an individual and indirect observing that interacting with third party. In current study we investigated whether dogs use and/or to choose between human interactants. first experiment, subjects had interaction either "nice" (who played with, talked stroked dog) or "ignoring" experimenter who ignored dog completely. Results...

10.1371/journal.pone.0046880 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2012-10-08

We presented small groups of chimpanzees with two collective action situations, in which was necessary for reward but there a disincentive individuals to act owing the possibility free-riding on efforts others. found that simpler scenarios (experiment 1) group size small, positive relationship between rank and more dominant volunteering often, particularly when less dispersed. Social tolerance also seemed mediate whereby higher levels within resulted lower ranks sometimes acting...

10.1098/rspb.2012.1948 article EN Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2012-10-17
Coming Soon ...