Jo Leonardi‐Bee

ORCID: 0000-0003-0893-6068
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections

University of Nottingham
2016-2025

Nottingham City Hospital
2014-2024

Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
2020-2023

UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies
2013-2022

Heidelberg University
2022

University Hospital Heidelberg
2022

National Institute for Health Research
2014-2015

Kanazawa University
2014

Cochrane
2011

Imperial College London
2007

Background and Purpose — Among patients with acute stroke, high blood pressure is often associated poor outcome, although the reason unclear. We analyzed data from International Stroke Trial (IST) to explore relationship between systolic (SBP), subsequent clinical events over next 2 weeks, functional outcome at 6 months in stroke. Methods included analysis 17 398 IST confirmed ischemic A single measurement of SBP was made immediately before randomization. Clinical within 14 days...

10.1161/01.str.0000014509.11540.66 article EN Stroke 2002-05-01

JBI recently began the process of updating and revising its suite critical appraisal tools to ensure that these remain compatible with recent developments within risk bias science. Following a rigorous development led by Effectiveness Methodology Group, this paper presents revised tool for assessment randomized controlled trials. This also practical guidance on how questions are be interpreted applied systematic reviewers, while providing topical examples. We discuss major changes made...

10.11124/jbies-22-00430 article EN JBI Evidence Synthesis 2023-02-02

<h3>Importance</h3> Timing of introduction allergenic foods to the infant diet may influence risk allergic or autoimmune disease, but evidence for this has not been comprehensively synthesized. <h3>Objective</h3> To systematically review and meta-analyze that timing food during infancy influences disease. <h3>Data Sources</h3> MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web Science, CENTRAL, LILACS databases were searched between January 1946 March 2016. <h3>Study Selection</h3> Intervention trials observational...

10.1001/jama.2016.12623 article EN JAMA 2016-09-20

JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations primary research studies. The designed be study-specific presented as questions in checklist. have existed checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, field synthesis expands, many tools offered by become outdated. quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must updated...

10.11124/jbies-22-00125 article EN JBI Evidence Synthesis 2022-09-19
Coming Soon ...