- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Game Theory and Applications
- Economic theories and models
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Auction Theory and Applications
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Economic Theory and Institutions
- Merger and Competition Analysis
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Business Strategy and Innovation
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Advanced Database Systems and Queries
University of California, Davis
2014-2023
University of California System
1991-2015
London School of Economics and Political Science
1985-2009
Norwegian School of Economics
2008-2009
University of Missouri
2008-2009
DePaul University
2009
Heythrop College, University of London
2009
Madison Group (United States)
2009
University of Kansas
2008
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development
2007
Journal Article Location Choice, Product Proliferation and Entry Deterrence Get access Giacomo Bonanno Nuffield College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 54, Issue 1, January 1987, Pages 37–45, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297444 Published: 01 1987 history Received: July 1985 Accepted: June 1986
For the past 20 years or so literature on noncooperative games has been centered search for an equilibrium concept that expresses notion of rational behavior in interactive situations. A basic tenet this is if a “rational solution” exists, it must be Nash . The consensus view, however, not all equilibria can accepted as solutions. Consider, example, game Figure 1.
Building on the analysis of Bonanno (Artificial Intelligence, 2025) we introduce a simple modal logic containing three operators: unimodal belief operator, bimodal conditional operator and global operator. For each AGM axiom for revision, provide corresponding axiom. The correspondence is as follows: characterized by property Kripke-Lewis frames considered in and, turn, that characterizes proposed
Abstract. This survey is organized as follows. I. Introduction. II. The main issues. III. Negishi's model. IV. Objective demand in the Cournot‐Nash framework. V. Bertrand‐Nash VI. assumption of quasi‐concavity profit functions. VII. Compromises between conjectural and objective approach. VIII. Insights into notion perfect competition. IX. Conclusion.
Journal Article Vertical Restraints in a Model of Differentiation Get access Patrick Bolton, Bolton Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Giacomo Bonanno California, Davis The Quarterly Economics, Volume 103, Issue 3, August 1988, Pages 555–570, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885545 Published: 01 1988
Abstract We investigate an axiomatization of the notion common belief (knowledge) that makes use no rules inference (apart from Modus Ponens and Necessitation) highlight property set accessibility relations characterizes each axiom. Mathematics Subject Classification: 03B45, 68T25.
Two views of game theory are discussed: (1) as a description the behavior rational individuals who recognize each other's reationality and reasoning abilities, (2) an internally consistent recommendation to on how act in interactive situations. It is shown that same mathematical tool, namely modal logic, can be used explicitly model both views.
This paper investigates the existence of oligopoly equilibria when firms arrive, through local price experiments, at a correct estimation their demand curves in neighborhood given statu s quo. The author provides sufficient conditions for Nash equilibrium, defined as point where each firm is maximum its profit function, prices charged by th e other firms. He also two examples, one duopoly with l ocal but no and duopol y equilibria. Copyright 1988 Economics Department University Pennsylvania...